34
edits
Difference between revisions of "11: Sam Harris - Fighting with Friends"
11: Sam Harris - Fighting with Friends (view source)
Revision as of 21:26, 7 April 2020
, 21:26, 7 April 2020→Transcript
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:04:09 Like this is an example, so you take the New York Times and you and I whinge about The New York Times a fair amount, uh... | '''Sam:''' 00:04:09 Like this is an example, so you take the New York Times and you and I whinge about The New York Times a fair amount, uh... | ||
'''Eric''' I've been watching you transition. | '''Eric:''' I've been watching you transition. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah (laughter) I've grown pretty dark about the paper of record. | '''Sam:''' Yeah (laughter) I've grown pretty dark about the paper of record. | ||
'''Eric''' That's new. | '''Eric:''' That's new. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah, yeah. | '''Sam:''' Yeah, yeah. | ||
'''Eric''' Like years five ago you were somewhere else. | '''Eric:''' Like years five ago you were somewhere else. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah, yeah, but I guess I'm wondering whether the cohort before us 20 years ago had this same litany of complaints about The New York Times or whether it's something fundamentally has shifted? | '''Sam:''' Yeah, yeah, but I guess I'm wondering whether the cohort before us 20 years ago had this same litany of complaints about The New York Times or whether it's something fundamentally has shifted? | ||
'''Eric''' Well I was on, I've been on the New York Times since the '80s, um... | '''Eric:''' Well I was on, I've been on the New York Times since the '80s, um... | ||
'''Sam''' So you were early to this party. | '''Sam:''' So you were early to this party. | ||
'''Eric''' Yeah, I was very early to this party for... | '''Eric:''' Yeah, I was very early to this party for... | ||
'''Sam''‘ But something has changed. So, it's this - is this worse than the '80s? | '''Sam''‘ But something has changed. So, it's this - is this worse than the '80s? | ||
'''Eric''' It's a good question. Depends. Worse isn't the right word, in my opinion. The way I would play with it is I'd say that its problem has always been the same, which is narrative-driven journalism. And the first clear indication I have of this, I think, was a story about Woodstock in which the paper told the reporter... | '''Eric:''' It's a good question. Depends. Worse isn't the right word, in my opinion. The way I would play with it is I'd say that its problem has always been the same, which is narrative-driven journalism. And the first clear indication I have of this, I think, was a story about Woodstock in which the paper told the reporter... | ||
'''Sam''' H-how old are you? You're not that much older than me. (laughter) | '''Sam:''' H-how old are you? You're not that much older than me. (laughter) | ||
'''Eric''' I’m 53, Sir. | '''Eric:''' I’m 53, Sir. | ||
'''Sam''' I was still in my diapers... | '''Sam:''' I was still in my diapers... | ||
'''Eric''' No, no, no, no, no! I don't remember this as a three-year-old! | '''Eric:''' No, no, no, no, no! I don't remember this as a three-year-old! | ||
'''Sam''' We're talking '69? or, something like that? | '''Sam:''' We're talking '69? or, something like that? | ||
'''Eric''' Yeah, no, no, it's not that. I remember reading - I will clarify - I remember reading a story about the journalist being sent, who was sent to cover Woodstock by The Times, being told, 'Write about the filth and the hippies and the unkemptness, and...' | '''Eric:''' Yeah, no, no, it's not that. I remember reading - I will clarify - I remember reading a story about the journalist being sent, who was sent to cover Woodstock by The Times, being told, 'Write about the filth and the hippies and the unkemptness, and...' | ||
'''Sam''' (laughter) Strangely, that's a bias that I now share. I, I, at one point, I had a, I, there was a point in my life in my, in my twenties where I kind of recapitulated the 60's for myself. | '''Sam:''' (laughter) Strangely, that's a bias that I now share. I, I, at one point, I had a, I, there was a point in my life in my, in my twenties where I kind of recapitulated the 60's for myself. | ||
'''Eric''' Ok | '''Eric:''' Ok | ||
'''Sam''' And had nothing but, you know, nostalgia for the 60's that I missed. But now I have a fairly Joan Didion look at the, you know, the "Slouching Towards Bethlehem" moment. That was a, it was just the level of dysfunction and the non-acknowledgement of dysfunction. It was pretty shocking. | '''Sam:''' And had nothing but, you know, nostalgia for the 60's that I missed. But now I have a fairly Joan Didion look at the, you know, the "Slouching Towards Bethlehem" moment. That was a, it was just the level of dysfunction and the non-acknowledgement of dysfunction. It was pretty shocking. | ||
'''Eric''' Well... | '''Eric:''' Well... | ||
'''Sam''' So I'm not getting really... | '''Sam:''' So I'm not getting really... | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:06:17 I'm really tempted to call it... Yeah, but I'm not, I'm not going back. Gambit declined. | '''Eric:''' 00:06:17 I'm really tempted to call it... Yeah, but I'm not, I'm not going back. Gambit declined. | ||
'''Sam''' Okay. | '''Sam:''' Okay. | ||
'''Eric''' The, what I recall of the story was, is that The Times that told the reporter what sort of story to file, and the reporter called up The Times and said, 'I refuse. I'm seeing something different. I'm seeing something inspiring and heart-opening and I'm not going to file that story. So, if that's what you want, how...' | '''Eric:''' The, what I recall of the story was, is that The Times that told the reporter what sort of story to file, and the reporter called up The Times and said, 'I refuse. I'm seeing something different. I'm seeing something inspiring and heart-opening and I'm not going to file that story. So, if that's what you want, how...' | ||
'''Sam''' And I have cholera (laughter) | '''Sam:''' And I have cholera (laughter) | ||
'''Eric''' And I have cholera. So, I think that the narrative aspect of The New York Times has been both its structural reason for its importance and the fatal flaw that in essence it carries these very long narrative arcs that come from the editor - the editorial function at The Times. And that those are written in some sense before the facts are known. And so, the facts are then fit to the narratives. And then when the counter-narratives occur, The Times really either doesn't report the story as is, and they really couldn't handle the-the situation that happened with my brother because it was exactly counter-narrative or then they distort based on the idea that they need to push things back into the narrative. | '''Eric:''' And I have cholera. So, I think that the narrative aspect of The New York Times has been both its structural reason for its importance and the fatal flaw that in essence it carries these very long narrative arcs that come from the editor - the editorial function at The Times. And that those are written in some sense before the facts are known. And so, the facts are then fit to the narratives. And then when the counter-narratives occur, The Times really either doesn't report the story as is, and they really couldn't handle the-the situation that happened with my brother because it was exactly counter-narrative or then they distort based on the idea that they need to push things back into the narrative. | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:07:24 So I think that has always been present. And there are particular kinds of stories that The Times writes that I find absolutely - well, I'll go so far as to say - borderline evil. And what they do is they crowd out whatever natural inquiry process would be happening. | '''Eric:''' 00:07:24 So I think that has always been present. And there are particular kinds of stories that The Times writes that I find absolutely - well, I'll go so far as to say - borderline evil. And what they do is they crowd out whatever natural inquiry process would be happening. | ||
'''Sam''' Mmm | '''Sam:''' Mmm | ||
'''Eric''' So I'm happy to get into a couple of examples about that. But I would say I think that the problem has been there at The New York Times all along. There are some new things that I see as happening there, like a conflict between the old-line journalists with the new line of sort of, you know, Brooklyn-based writers who are telling us how to, how to think. | '''Eric:''' So I'm happy to get into a couple of examples about that. But I would say I think that the problem has been there at The New York Times all along. There are some new things that I see as happening there, like a conflict between the old-line journalists with the new line of sort of, you know, Brooklyn-based writers who are telling us how to, how to think. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah. | '''Sam:''' Yeah. | ||
'''Eric''' What do you make of it? | '''Eric:''' What do you make of it? | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:08:08 I don't know if this, The Times is maybe an exception here, but I think generally what's happening in journalism, there's just been a clearing out of real journalists, right? I mean, the business has gotten so bad and again, The Times and the Post and The Atlantic, there's a few outliers here that are doing well in the age of Trump at least, you know, sort of, well. | '''Sam:''' 00:08:08 I don't know if this, The Times is maybe an exception here, but I think generally what's happening in journalism, there's just been a clearing out of real journalists, right? I mean, the business has gotten so bad and again, The Times and the Post and The Atlantic, there's a few outliers here that are doing well in the age of Trump at least, you know, sort of, well. | ||
'''Eric''' Trump is saving their business. | '''Eric:''' Trump is saving their business. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah. I mean they were actually there, they weren't doing great before Trump, but now they're doing okay. But the rest of journalism has been gutted. And now we basically have the Blogosphere and you know, kind of what the Huffington Post did to the landscape where you just have a lot of people blogging for free propping up a, a, an ad-based clickbait business model. | '''Sam:''' Yeah. I mean they were actually there, they weren't doing great before Trump, but now they're doing okay. But the rest of journalism has been gutted. And now we basically have the Blogosphere and you know, kind of what the Huffington Post did to the landscape where you just have a lot of people blogging for free propping up a, a, an ad-based clickbait business model. | ||
'''Eric''' Sure. But again, that the, I, I guess what I want to play with is, is there something special about institutions? Imagine that you can get all of the interesting articles that you like somewhere, and somebody's saying something interesting, you can piece them together. But the fact that there's no institutional home where you can trust that, like, the Office of Management and Budget or something or... | '''Eric:''' Sure. But again, that the, I, I guess what I want to play with is, is there something special about institutions? Imagine that you can get all of the interesting articles that you like somewhere, and somebody's saying something interesting, you can piece them together. But the fact that there's no institutional home where you can trust that, like, the Office of Management and Budget or something or... | ||
'''Sam''' But it's not what I'm saying to be bad about journalism in general is that what you think of as the institution. I mean, just like the veneer, the front-facing website is not even an institution in many cases. It's like it's a hard to differentiate what is a blog and what is an actual journalistic resource that has editors and fact-checkers and copy editors. And you know, for certain sites, the distinction is apparently non-existent. I mean, so like, you know, people used to think Salon was real journalism or with The Guardian. I mean, The Guardian has like kind of the blog side and The Guardian side and you can't tell the difference. You're just reading what somebody wrote and well... | '''Sam:''' But it's not what I'm saying to be bad about journalism in general is that what you think of as the institution. I mean, just like the veneer, the front-facing website is not even an institution in many cases. It's like it's a hard to differentiate what is a blog and what is an actual journalistic resource that has editors and fact-checkers and copy editors. And you know, for certain sites, the distinction is apparently non-existent. I mean, so like, you know, people used to think Salon was real journalism or with The Guardian. I mean, The Guardian has like kind of the blog side and The Guardian side and you can't tell the difference. You're just reading what somebody wrote and well... | ||
'''Eric''' ...and you find the same people on Twitter. | '''Eric:''' ...and you find the same people on Twitter. | ||
'''Sam''' And then everyone is nuts on Twitter, whatever their reputation, right? Really is, you know, or should have been. | '''Sam:''' And then everyone is nuts on Twitter, whatever their reputation, right? Really is, you know, or should have been. | ||
'''Eric''' Well, you could just see their, their bias, like they're not hiding it on Twitter and then they hide it when they're in their journalistic frame. | '''Eric:''' Well, you could just see their, their bias, like they're not hiding it on Twitter and then they hide it when they're in their journalistic frame. | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:10:18 Next up, we're thrilled to be welcoming back, returning sponsor Boll and Branch maker of luxury sheets. Now what has Boll and Branch figured out? Well, first of all, they make fantastic shades, but they've also figured out how to cut out the middle-man and sell directly to their consumers. That means that we all get a huge discount and some of the best sleeps of our life. If you've ever wondered why when you go over to a particular friend's house or perhaps a luxury hotel, you wake up feeling refreshed. It might very well be that the sheets are cut above what you're used to sleeping on. They make the softest and most comfortable sheets in the world, the only ones beloved by three U.S. presidents from both political parties. So, for a limited time you can get their luxury flannel bedding to keep you cool sleepers warm and because they breathe, keep the warm sleepers cool. | '''Eric:''' 00:10:18 Next up, we're thrilled to be welcoming back, returning sponsor Boll and Branch maker of luxury sheets. Now what has Boll and Branch figured out? Well, first of all, they make fantastic shades, but they've also figured out how to cut out the middle-man and sell directly to their consumers. That means that we all get a huge discount and some of the best sleeps of our life. If you've ever wondered why when you go over to a particular friend's house or perhaps a luxury hotel, you wake up feeling refreshed. It might very well be that the sheets are cut above what you're used to sleeping on. They make the softest and most comfortable sheets in the world, the only ones beloved by three U.S. presidents from both political parties. So, for a limited time you can get their luxury flannel bedding to keep you cool sleepers warm and because they breathe, keep the warm sleepers cool. | ||
| Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:11:01 That's genius for sheets. How do they know? Shipping is always free. You can try them out for 30 nights risk-free and right now you can get $50 off your first set of sheets@bollandbranch.com if you use promo code Portal, so get $50 off@bollandbranch.com using promo code Portal. That's Boll, B-O-L-L and branch.com using code Portal. I think you'll enjoy it. They make fantastic sheets. | '''Eric:''' 00:11:01 That's genius for sheets. How do they know? Shipping is always free. You can try them out for 30 nights risk-free and right now you can get $50 off your first set of sheets@bollandbranch.com if you use promo code Portal, so get $50 off@bollandbranch.com using promo code Portal. That's Boll, B-O-L-L and branch.com using code Portal. I think you'll enjoy it. They make fantastic sheets. | ||
'''Eric''' Next up. Our most ironic returning sponsor Four Sigmatic. Now, unless you'd been living under an absolute rock, you probably know that researchers have been studying mushrooms for their incredible medicinal properties in particular, strains like Lion's mane and Chaga. Mushrooms are being investigated for their cognitive benefits. Unfortunately, some of us can't stand mushrooms. I in particular have stated that part of my life's mission is to carry out a vendetta against entire mushroom family. However, somehow, I've run out of the product that Four Sigmatic actually provided me with when I started doing the show. | '''Eric:''' Next up. Our most ironic returning sponsor Four Sigmatic. Now, unless you'd been living under an absolute rock, you probably know that researchers have been studying mushrooms for their incredible medicinal properties in particular, strains like Lion's mane and Chaga. Mushrooms are being investigated for their cognitive benefits. Unfortunately, some of us can't stand mushrooms. I in particular have stated that part of my life's mission is to carry out a vendetta against entire mushroom family. However, somehow, I've run out of the product that Four Sigmatic actually provided me with when I started doing the show. | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:12:01 Why? Because apparently according to my household, I am consuming their product at an alarming rate. In particular, I love the coffee and I love the tea that they make as well as the lattes and the hot chocolate products. All of these things do not taste like mushrooms. They taste like whatever these guys have been able to blend the mushrooms into. In fact, it's an incredible experience for me that I can now finally participate as an adult in a food group that I was always fenced out of previously. Please look into them. Go to foursigmatic.com/portal or use the discount code, P-O-R-T-A-L at checkout, that's foursigmatic.com/portal and I think you'll be very pleased with your purchase. Try it. It's certainly working for me. Foursigmatic.Com/Portal | '''Eric:''' 00:12:01 Why? Because apparently according to my household, I am consuming their product at an alarming rate. In particular, I love the coffee and I love the tea that they make as well as the lattes and the hot chocolate products. All of these things do not taste like mushrooms. They taste like whatever these guys have been able to blend the mushrooms into. In fact, it's an incredible experience for me that I can now finally participate as an adult in a food group that I was always fenced out of previously. Please look into them. Go to foursigmatic.com/portal or use the discount code, P-O-R-T-A-L at checkout, that's foursigmatic.com/portal and I think you'll be very pleased with your purchase. Try it. It's certainly working for me. Foursigmatic.Com/Portal | ||
| Line 156: | Line 156: | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:12:50 Well, I would argue that, you know, I'm fairly forgiving on that point because I feel that Trump has made the hiding of one's so-called bias irresponsible, essentially, it's like you, you can't, you can't pretend that this is a normal president doing normal things and you're going to be a normal journalist without an opinion. | '''Sam:''' 00:12:50 Well, I would argue that, you know, I'm fairly forgiving on that point because I feel that Trump has made the hiding of one's so-called bias irresponsible, essentially, it's like you, you can't, you can't pretend that this is a normal president doing normal things and you're going to be a normal journalist without an opinion. | ||
'''Eric''' Well, I agree with that. Although I would say you and I are very split on this, so put a placeholder, maybe we'll get back to it. | '''Eric:''' Well, I agree with that. Although I would say you and I are very split on this, so put a placeholder, maybe we'll get back to it. | ||
'''Sam''' Sure. | '''Sam:''' Sure. | ||
'''Eric''' Maybe not. I'm more worried about the loss of things like Nature and Science than I am The New York Times. I'm now worried that there is nothing, and even in the hard sciences almost that can stand up to the onslaught of political pressure creeping in to everything that has to be able to say no, that we've lost the ability to tell people to screw off if they're wrong. | '''Eric:''' Maybe not. I'm more worried about the loss of things like Nature and Science than I am The New York Times. I'm now worried that there is nothing, and even in the hard sciences almost that can stand up to the onslaught of political pressure creeping in to everything that has to be able to say no, that we've lost the ability to tell people to screw off if they're wrong. | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:13:49 Well it's certainly been creeping up on us in the life sciences. It's been true of the social sciences for a very long time. | '''Sam:''' 00:13:49 Well it's certainly been creeping up on us in the life sciences. It's been true of the social sciences for a very long time. | ||
| Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:14:22 Oh, I think it's just different problems. I don't know which is more consequential. I think the I think the failure to have a fact-based discussion and the incentives to avoid one, I think that's just the scariest thing we have going apart from the true Monsters of Pandemic and Nuclear War and things like that. | '''Sam:''' 00:14:22 Oh, I think it's just different problems. I don't know which is more consequential. I think the I think the failure to have a fact-based discussion and the incentives to avoid one, I think that's just the scariest thing we have going apart from the true Monsters of Pandemic and Nuclear War and things like that. | ||
'''Eric''' Well, those are now increasingly relative with the, you know, vaxxer or anti-vaxxer you know, controversy, but the self-refereeing, like one of the things that's really important to have a decent discussion, in my opinion, is that you have to agree what a discussion is and what constitutes an illegal move. And increasingly I feel like we're having these combat sports where we can't agree on what rules - like is biting an ear part of boxing? Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Who's to say? Well, that's an imposition of your views on mine. Who can still self-adjudicate? | '''Eric:''' Well, those are now increasingly relative with the, you know, vaxxer or anti-vaxxer you know, controversy, but the self-refereeing, like one of the things that's really important to have a decent discussion, in my opinion, is that you have to agree what a discussion is and what constitutes an illegal move. And increasingly I feel like we're having these combat sports where we can't agree on what rules - like is biting an ear part of boxing? Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Who's to say? Well, that's an imposition of your views on mine. Who can still self-adjudicate? | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:15:27 Well I think if you wait long enough, you see the failures of hypocrisy, right? You see people try to enshrine a new set of rules that prove unworkable in some of the context, you know, or, or they, they just can't live up to them because of... it's impossible. I mean, we're now noticing, and it's been widely observed that more or less, if you wait around long enough, everyone's going to get canceled. You know, it's like the repurposing of the Warhol quote, you know, we'll all be canceled for 15 minutes at some point. | '''Sam:''' 00:15:27 Well I think if you wait long enough, you see the failures of hypocrisy, right? You see people try to enshrine a new set of rules that prove unworkable in some of the context, you know, or, or they, they just can't live up to them because of... it's impossible. I mean, we're now noticing, and it's been widely observed that more or less, if you wait around long enough, everyone's going to get canceled. You know, it's like the repurposing of the Warhol quote, you know, we'll all be canceled for 15 minutes at some point. | ||
'''Eric''' (laughter) "fifteen minutes"! | '''Eric:''' (laughter) "fifteen minutes"! | ||
'''Sam''' And it’s, just before we started this podcast, we were joking that, you know, Justin Trudeau has yet another black face photo of himself apparently appearing online. And here's, you know, one of the most woke and sanctimonious enforcers of this new norm of just political correctness you know, stretching to infinity and he's, he's got not only (laughter) black face in his past, but an apparently a positive passion for blackface. | '''Sam:''' And it’s, just before we started this podcast, we were joking that, you know, Justin Trudeau has yet another black face photo of himself apparently appearing online. And here's, you know, one of the most woke and sanctimonious enforcers of this new norm of just political correctness you know, stretching to infinity and he's, he's got not only (laughter) black face in his past, but an apparently a positive passion for blackface. | ||
'''Eric''' That's a recurring issue. | '''Eric:''' That's a recurring issue. | ||
'''Sam''' So it's, it's I mean the hypocrisy is, is so delicious, but it's just, it's just the yeah, the, these, these new norms of not being honest about facts just can't scale. I mean there, people will, people will be tripped up by them and so, and it's not, so you can, we can't do a lot of harm to ourselves in the meantime or in certain areas. | '''Sam:''' So it's, it's I mean the hypocrisy is, is so delicious, but it's just, it's just the yeah, the, these, these new norms of not being honest about facts just can't scale. I mean there, people will, people will be tripped up by them and so, and it's not, so you can, we can't do a lot of harm to ourselves in the meantime or in certain areas. | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:17:10 Well, I think we're trying to do harm to ourselves. | '''Eric:''' 00:17:10 Well, I think we're trying to do harm to ourselves. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah. | '''Sam:''' Yeah. | ||
'''Eric''' I think that the idea, yeah. Sometimes I think about Trump as the doctor who has to break a bone that has miss - has been mis-set in the hopes that it can finally heal properly. And this is one of the places where you are... | '''Eric:''' I think that the idea, yeah. Sometimes I think about Trump as the doctor who has to break a bone that has miss - has been mis-set in the hopes that it can finally heal properly. And this is one of the places where you are... | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:17:28 Yeah except he's the doctor who doesn't know which bone he has in hand and, and a isn't actually intending to heal you. | '''Sam:''' 00:17:28 Yeah except he's the doctor who doesn't know which bone he has in hand and, and a isn't actually intending to heal you. | ||
'''Eric''' Well, and... | '''Eric:''' Well, and... | ||
So, it's the happy accident of the doctor who happens, the mad man who happens to have a hold of the right femur and a is breaking it for the wrong reasons, but to good effect. | So, it's the happy accident of the doctor who happens, the mad man who happens to have a hold of the right femur and a is breaking it for the wrong reasons, but to good effect. | ||
| Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:17:44 Right. Or you know, is it doctored in folklore and from some non-accredited... | '''Eric:''' 00:17:44 Right. Or you know, is it doctored in folklore and from some non-accredited... | ||
'''Sam''' I'm so sorry to keep segueing on you, but I know you have a passion for India. I remember once traveling in India and seeing somebody's - a doctor's - it was actually a dentist's shingle and it was saying you know "Western-trained Dentist" and in parentheses 'failed'. But having, just having just made the attempt was enough to put that on the, on the shingle. | '''Sam:''' I'm so sorry to keep segueing on you, but I know you have a passion for India. I remember once traveling in India and seeing somebody's - a doctor's - it was actually a dentist's shingle and it was saying you know "Western-trained Dentist" and in parentheses 'failed'. But having, just having just made the attempt was enough to put that on the, on the shingle. | ||
'''Eric''' (laughter) Oh, that's good. I mean, that does... | '''Eric:''' (laughter) Oh, that's good. I mean, that does... | ||
'''Eric''' So I think you get Trump wrong. | '''Eric:''' So I think you get Trump wrong. | ||
'''Sam''' Right? | '''Sam:''' Right? | ||
'''Eric''' And it's not, I see what you see and it's maddening. It's driving me crazy. The idea of spending four more precious years of my dwindling life, talking about whatever Trump less said or tweeted or worried that I don't know what would happen if we actually had a five-alarm fire in the U S that had to be handled. | '''Eric:''' And it's not, I see what you see and it's maddening. It's driving me crazy. The idea of spending four more precious years of my dwindling life, talking about whatever Trump less said or tweeted or worried that I don't know what would happen if we actually had a five-alarm fire in the U S that had to be handled. | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:18:45 Do you think my model of his mind is wrong or my model of the consequences of, of him being in office is wrong? | '''Sam:''' 00:18:45 Do you think my model of his mind is wrong or my model of the consequences of, of him being in office is wrong? | ||
'''Eric''' Well, I think that you were slow to give him his due. I mean, of course, as you know, I wrote this essay on kayfabe anticipating that professional wrestling was going to turn out to be incredibly important. And in fact, I thought it was going to determine the presidency - that was a, a belief I had that understanding how lies play within the mind and how hypocrisy works and then a concept called namespaces out of Python programming and the like, how we compartmentalize, led me to believe that in essence we were - I had seen these other candidacies in other countries in which people seem not to be able to distinguish an actor from the character that they played, you know, whatnot. And so, I, I believed that the system of laws within professional wrestling told us what was possible. And Trump actually sort of came out of the WWE through his association with, with the McMahon family. | '''Eric:''' Well, I think that you were slow to give him his due. I mean, of course, as you know, I wrote this essay on kayfabe anticipating that professional wrestling was going to turn out to be incredibly important. And in fact, I thought it was going to determine the presidency - that was a, a belief I had that understanding how lies play within the mind and how hypocrisy works and then a concept called namespaces out of Python programming and the like, how we compartmentalize, led me to believe that in essence we were - I had seen these other candidacies in other countries in which people seem not to be able to distinguish an actor from the character that they played, you know, whatnot. And so, I, I believed that the system of laws within professional wrestling told us what was possible. And Trump actually sort of came out of the WWE through his association with, with the McMahon family. | ||
'''Sam''' Yep | '''Sam:''' Yep | ||
'''Eric''' And I believe that he actually understood deep things that psychology departments will wake up to 20 years from now. | '''Eric:''' And I believe that he actually understood deep things that psychology departments will wake up to 20 years from now. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah, well I guess... | '''Sam:''' Yeah, well I guess... | ||
'''Eric''' Let me just... | '''Eric:''' Let me just... | ||
'''Sam''' I've suggested by analogy to the Chauncey Gardiner effect, or the evil Chauncey Gardiner effect. | '''Sam:''' I've suggested by analogy to the Chauncey Gardiner effect, or the evil Chauncey Gardiner effect. | ||
'''Eric''' Well, but that's wrong. | '''Eric:''' Well, but that's wrong. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah, I think, I think, but it's hard to know that could happen. I mean, it's, it's definitely falsifiable. My theory is falsifiable. He could prove to me with a string of utterances that he's the evil genius that I haven't imagined him to be, but he hasn't done that. | '''Sam:''' Yeah, I think, I think, but it's hard to know that could happen. I mean, it's, it's definitely falsifiable. My theory is falsifiable. He could prove to me with a string of utterances that he's the evil genius that I haven't imagined him to be, but he hasn't done that. | ||
'''Eric''' I bet if you and I had a couple of old-fashioneds between us and we sat down with a thousand of his tweets, we could figure out that they're recurrent structures and we could write an Eliza program to generate them to, to tangle Democrats. I think that there's much more method to the madness. And I, I don't have to go full Scott Adams, ''Scott, I know you're out there somewhere,'' to, to say that everything is intentional and brilliant. I just think he's got a, you know, it was for years, I said that if you wanted to win an election against a Democrat, you just would talk about the nuclear family, let them correct you to nuclear, and then you'd win because you'd come across as an ass. | '''Eric:''' I bet if you and I had a couple of old-fashioneds between us and we sat down with a thousand of his tweets, we could figure out that they're recurrent structures and we could write an Eliza program to generate them to, to tangle Democrats. I think that there's much more method to the madness. And I, I don't have to go full Scott Adams, ''Scott, I know you're out there somewhere,'' to, to say that everything is intentional and brilliant. I just think he's got a, you know, it was for years, I said that if you wanted to win an election against a Democrat, you just would talk about the nuclear family, let them correct you to nuclear, and then you'd win because you'd come across as an ass. | ||
'''Sam''' Right, exactly. | '''Sam:''' Right, exactly. | ||
'''Eric''' So I think that there is a certain amount of method that you were slow to give, give him credit for. But I think you're probably inching towards the idea that if he's not an evil genius, he has some evil genius. | '''Eric:''' So I think that there is a certain amount of method that you were slow to give, give him credit for. But I think you're probably inching towards the idea that if he's not an evil genius, he has some evil genius. | ||
'''Sam''' I think it's just, again, I, I'm enamored of my Chauncey Gardiner-Gardner analogy. | '''Sam:''' I think it's just, again, I, I'm enamored of my Chauncey Gardiner-Gardner analogy. | ||
'''Eric''' All right. | '''Eric:''' All right. | ||
'''Sam''' Well here's another analogy that that is even simpler and a more easy, easier to confirm. It's clear there's a method, but I think it's just a very simple method that the power of which is an accident of the context. So it's like an Instagram model has a method, right? You know, they just, if you have a great body, show it to great effect on your Instagram channel and then wait around for people to follow you. Right? So there's a very simple formula. There's no question it works. It's, there's not a lot of method to it. | '''Sam:''' Well here's another analogy that that is even simpler and a more easy, easier to confirm. It's clear there's a method, but I think it's just a very simple method that the power of which is an accident of the context. So it's like an Instagram model has a method, right? You know, they just, if you have a great body, show it to great effect on your Instagram channel and then wait around for people to follow you. Right? So there's a very simple formula. There's no question it works. It's, there's not a lot of method to it. | ||
'''Eric''' But in the rallies that he likes, the rallies are a feedback mechanism. | '''Eric:''' But in the rallies that he likes, the rallies are a feedback mechanism. | ||
'''Sam''' Right. | '''Sam:''' Right. | ||
'''Eric''' So he knows, he knows that the feedback that he's getting from the press, in general, has a constant distortion. And so by holding a rally, he can figure out to some ext..... I mean, it's like constant AB testing. | '''Eric:''' So he knows, he knows that the feedback that he's getting from the press, in general, has a constant distortion. And so by holding a rally, he can figure out to some ext..... I mean, it's like constant AB testing. | ||
'''Sam''' But it doesn't have the fact that he wasn't canceled for one of his sins... | '''Sam:''' But it doesn't have the fact that he wasn't canceled for one of his sins... | ||
'''Eric''' He was! | '''Eric:''' He was! | ||
'''Sam''' No, but the fact that the fact that there's enough, there are enough people to insulate... he has enough fans of this style of, of communication and, and living that he's, he's uncancellable. Right? | '''Sam:''' No, but the fact that the fact that there's enough, there are enough people to insulate... he has enough fans of this style of, of communication and, and living that he's, he's uncancellable. Right? | ||
'''Sam''' The fact that we have 40%... | '''Sam:''' The fact that we have 40%... | ||
'''Eric''' No he's cancelled. | '''Eric:''' No he's cancelled. | ||
'''Sam''' No, no. We have 40% of the American population that fundamentally does not care about any of the things I care about in him. | '''Sam:''' No, no. We have 40% of the American population that fundamentally does not care about any of the things I care about in him. | ||
'''Eric''' I disagree with this, Sam. I think you're getting this wrong. This is what I think might be interesting. I'm happy to be... | '''Eric:''' I disagree with this, Sam. I think you're getting this wrong. This is what I think might be interesting. I'm happy to be... | ||
'''Sam''' Okay. | '''Sam:''' Okay. | ||
'''Eric''' I'm happy to be wrong, too. | '''Eric:''' I'm happy to be wrong, too. | ||
'''Sam''' So you think that at what point, are we wrong? | '''Sam:''' So you think that at what point, are we wrong? | ||
'''Eric''' I think we're still in the stage of being so angry at Bill Clintonism... | '''Eric:''' I think we're still in the stage of being so angry at Bill Clintonism... | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah. | '''Sam:''' Yeah. | ||
'''Eric''' That we just want to know you're not owned. We want something that convinces us that it's not taking orders... | '''Eric:''' That we just want to know you're not owned. We want something that convinces us that it's not taking orders... | ||
'''Sam''' Well, but we're completely insouciant on the point of you potentially being owned by the Russians when that begins to get leaked? | '''Sam:''' Well, but we're completely insouciant on the point of you potentially being owned by the Russians when that begins to get leaked? | ||
'''Eric''' Believe me, I think about this. I don't know. I ha - I haven't followed all the details. It's possible he's compromised and under direct control. | '''Eric:''' Believe me, I think about this. I don't know. I ha - I haven't followed all the details. It's possible he's compromised and under direct control. | ||
'''Sam''' Well let's just bracket that. We don't, let's say, we don't know. But when that begins to become a story, and a credible story the zero interest from the people who are worried about him being owned by the usual suspects... | '''Sam:''' Well let's just bracket that. We don't, let's say, we don't know. But when that begins to become a story, and a credible story the zero interest from the people who are worried about him being owned by the usual suspects... | ||
'''Eric''' You see, you don't carry the same anger and passion that I do for getting rid of the rot that was the American center. In other words, I believe ... one of the things that I find very confusing is, is that you and I, I think would normally have been called centrists, right? But we're not crypt... we're not klepto centrists. I mean, I've never been in a position to, you know, to loot the treasury from the position of being a centrist. | '''Eric:''' You see, you don't carry the same anger and passion that I do for getting rid of the rot that was the American center. In other words, I believe ... one of the things that I find very confusing is, is that you and I, I think would normally have been called centrists, right? But we're not crypt... we're not klepto centrists. I mean, I've never been in a position to, you know, to loot the treasury from the position of being a centrist. | ||
'''Sam''' Right. | '''Sam:''' Right. | ||
'''Eric''' So the interesting thing about the center is that the center produces the, the blank canvas of America on which we get to paint. So I'm not really super excited to get a politician that makes me swoon. I want somebody to just gesso a canvas so that we can build all of the, you know, companies and nonprofits and do all the beautiful work that makes this country amazing. I'm not trying to get my entertainment from government. | '''Eric:''' So the interesting thing about the center is that the center produces the, the blank canvas of America on which we get to paint. So I'm not really super excited to get a politician that makes me swoon. I want somebody to just gesso a canvas so that we can build all of the, you know, companies and nonprofits and do all the beautiful work that makes this country amazing. I'm not trying to get my entertainment from government. | ||
The thing that crept into our system with Reagan and Bush giving way to the Clintons back to Bush, and then bizarrely I thought Obama was going to be a break from this, that thing induces a passion in some of us to get rid of it. We hate it and I don't know that you carry that passion and so I think it's harder for you to understand it and I carry it not from a right-wing perspective. I carry it from a progressive to center-left position. | The thing that crept into our system with Reagan and Bush giving way to the Clintons back to Bush, and then bizarrely I thought Obama was going to be a break from this, that thing induces a passion in some of us to get rid of it. We hate it and I don't know that you carry that passion and so I think it's harder for you to understand it and I carry it not from a right-wing perspective. I carry it from a progressive to center-left position. | ||
| Line 287: | Line 287: | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:27:51 Well, and some of this comes back to the hypocrisy point I was making before. So, I, I have that Trumpian module in my brain that feels just the pure schadenfreude of seeing Justin Trudeau get wholly cloistered on his own petard, right? So, here's this sanctimonious enforcer of woke culture just pandering to the left, it's clearly unsustainable, it's clearly dishonest, it's, and unworkable. And, you know, offline we spoke about just that moment where he's, he's admonishing this, this elementary school-age girl when she says the word mankind, which is a, you know it's great to hear a sixth grader use a phrase, mankind. But he says: "No, we say people kind". Maybe they say people kind up in Canada, I haven't heard that. But, you know, even just saying humankind there and, and, and enforcing that, that taboo there was just, that's the elitism the goofy elitism that, that... | '''Sam:''' 00:27:51 Well, and some of this comes back to the hypocrisy point I was making before. So, I, I have that Trumpian module in my brain that feels just the pure schadenfreude of seeing Justin Trudeau get wholly cloistered on his own petard, right? So, here's this sanctimonious enforcer of woke culture just pandering to the left, it's clearly unsustainable, it's clearly dishonest, it's, and unworkable. And, you know, offline we spoke about just that moment where he's, he's admonishing this, this elementary school-age girl when she says the word mankind, which is a, you know it's great to hear a sixth grader use a phrase, mankind. But he says: "No, we say people kind". Maybe they say people kind up in Canada, I haven't heard that. But, you know, even just saying humankind there and, and, and enforcing that, that taboo there was just, that's the elitism the goofy elitism that, that... | ||
'''Eric''' Yeah but it's not the elitism. It's the fact that these people have been picking our pockets and they've been divorcing us from each other. | '''Eric:''' Yeah but it's not the elitism. It's the fact that these people have been picking our pockets and they've been divorcing us from each other. | ||
'''Sam''' I'm just saying, I get the, 'let's just watch these fuckers burn' stream of pleasure that you can get coursing in your brain. And that, that explains a lot of the Trump phenomenon where it's just, on some level, they don't care that he's the most odious liar we've ever seen. Are they being his, his fan base? They just love to see him wind up the libtards or they love to see... | '''Sam:''' I'm just saying, I get the, 'let's just watch these fuckers burn' stream of pleasure that you can get coursing in your brain. And that, that explains a lot of the Trump phenomenon where it's just, on some level, they don't care that he's the most odious liar we've ever seen. Are they being his, his fan base? They just love to see him wind up the libtards or they love to see... | ||
'''Eric''' It's not the libtards that they...Sam. I'm really trying to get at something. I may be wrong, so forgive me if I'm, if I'm going off on a tangent, but I really think that there was something much more evil. It wasn't just that people were sneering at us over crudité. You know, it's like, it's that they were picking our pockets. They were divorcing us from each other. They came up with a bullshit ideology, if you will, of the, of the Davos flavor that said, you know, we are the world and divorced us from each other in terms of our obligations to fellow countrymen above our obligations to people who, you know, live abroad. That was really a cover for figuring out how to make money when we were largely in many ways stagnant. And so you had a class of people who probably blew out the Gini coefficient for the U S without getting to the real issues of the fact that we're a country, that we put people in uniform and you know, send them into harm's way, that we have a higher duty and care in most of our minds to each other than we do to equally deserving people overseas. | '''Eric:''' It's not the libtards that they...Sam. I'm really trying to get at something. I may be wrong, so forgive me if I'm, if I'm going off on a tangent, but I really think that there was something much more evil. It wasn't just that people were sneering at us over crudité. You know, it's like, it's that they were picking our pockets. They were divorcing us from each other. They came up with a bullshit ideology, if you will, of the, of the Davos flavor that said, you know, we are the world and divorced us from each other in terms of our obligations to fellow countrymen above our obligations to people who, you know, live abroad. That was really a cover for figuring out how to make money when we were largely in many ways stagnant. And so you had a class of people who probably blew out the Gini coefficient for the U S without getting to the real issues of the fact that we're a country, that we put people in uniform and you know, send them into harm's way, that we have a higher duty and care in most of our minds to each other than we do to equally deserving people overseas. | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:30:37 But for the most part that the left was the political party that, that, I mean everyone was part of that same extractive economy, but the left at least paid lip service to the virtue of spreading the wealth around. | '''Sam:''' 00:30:37 But for the most part that the left was the political party that, that, I mean everyone was part of that same extractive economy, but the left at least paid lip service to the virtue of spreading the wealth around. | ||
| Line 299: | Line 299: | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:31:30 Yeah, there's something to that. But I think there's also all too common phenomenon of people motivated by actually good intentions, even incredibly noble intentions, causing a lot of chaos that they didn't intend, right? So, let me take... | '''Sam:''' 00:31:30 Yeah, there's something to that. But I think there's also all too common phenomenon of people motivated by actually good intentions, even incredibly noble intentions, causing a lot of chaos that they didn't intend, right? So, let me take... | ||
'''Eric''' Is that, is that your model for what was going on? | '''Eric:''' Is that, is that your model for what was going on? | ||
'''Sam''' Well, it's, it's, it's my model for part of it. So, I mean, take someone like, well, let me take Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, right? Well, I don't know Mark I don't know how mercenary he's been from the beginning or, and how out of touch with the possible harms he might cause, he's been. | '''Sam:''' Well, it's, it's, it's my model for part of it. So, I mean, take someone like, well, let me take Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, right? Well, I don't know Mark I don't know how mercenary he's been from the beginning or, and how out of touch with the possible harms he might cause, he's been. | ||
But I can, well imagine that here's somebody who could honestly say, you know, connecting people is an intrinsic good. I'm just going to do that better than anybody. And the, you know, the wealth will come and this is all good for everybody. Right? And then only at the 11th hour, you know, long after many of us have, have noticed a problem, he begins to play catch up with the problem. | But I can, well imagine that here's somebody who could honestly say, you know, connecting people is an intrinsic good. I'm just going to do that better than anybody. And the, you know, the wealth will come and this is all good for everybody. Right? And then only at the 11th hour, you know, long after many of us have, have noticed a problem, he begins to play catch up with the problem. | ||
| Line 313: | Line 313: | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:35:07 I actually have some weird backstory on that one. So, I knew Samantha Power at the Kennedy School and she and I sat down, I mean, not, well I don't think. We sat down at a meal and we had friends that connected us. Right. And I asked what you were at, what are you interested in? And she said, well, I'm obsessed with the Red Sox and genocide. Yeah. I said, what? | '''Eric:''' 00:35:07 I actually have some weird backstory on that one. So, I knew Samantha Power at the Kennedy School and she and I sat down, I mean, not, well I don't think. We sat down at a meal and we had friends that connected us. Right. And I asked what you were at, what are you interested in? And she said, well, I'm obsessed with the Red Sox and genocide. Yeah. I said, what? | ||
'''Sam''' That's a good icebreaker. | '''Sam:''' That's a good icebreaker. | ||
'''Eric''' And she said, well, you know, the rap on me is I'm all genocide all the time, but nobody cares. And I, you know, I've got book and I can't figure out the answer to the question, why is there not a resolution that we will never, why is it never again not a resolution? And every time I try to get a state to sign up for this or somebody to take this seriously, there's this weird wall that comes down. | '''Eric:''' And she said, well, you know, the rap on me is I'm all genocide all the time, but nobody cares. And I, you know, I've got book and I can't figure out the answer to the question, why is there not a resolution that we will never, why is it never again not a resolution? And every time I try to get a state to sign up for this or somebody to take this seriously, there's this weird wall that comes down. | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:35:54 It's the clearest thing in the world that we should never let genocide ever happen again. Right? And she was convinced and nobody's going to take her seriously. This was going to go nowhere. And then progressively, somehow this thing started to catch fire and I, for a period of time I was emailing her like, do you believe it now? Do you believe it now that this, cause I, I knew this thing was going to get huge? | '''Eric:''' 00:35:54 It's the clearest thing in the world that we should never let genocide ever happen again. Right? And she was convinced and nobody's going to take her seriously. This was going to go nowhere. And then progressively, somehow this thing started to catch fire and I, for a period of time I was emailing her like, do you believe it now? Do you believe it now that this, cause I, I knew this thing was going to get huge? | ||
| Line 334: | Line 334: | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:39:33 Yeah. Well I think people are, you're not going to get me to disagree there that people are impressively split or at least can be. And I think a coherence generally speaking or at least striving for it is good. And I think, living an examined life in part as it is, is struggling with those discoveries of, of incoherence and figuring out how to get this congress of mine, as you call yourself, to actually cohere. | '''Sam:''' 00:39:33 Yeah. Well I think people are, you're not going to get me to disagree there that people are impressively split or at least can be. And I think a coherence generally speaking or at least striving for it is good. And I think, living an examined life in part as it is, is struggling with those discoveries of, of incoherence and figuring out how to get this congress of mine, as you call yourself, to actually cohere. | ||
'''Eric''' But you're getting them to cohere. | '''Eric:''' But you're getting them to cohere. | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:40:01 Yeah. No. So, but so, but when you're talking about the normal person who, I think it is a frequent phenomenon , to have, you know, normal, the normal range of good intentions to not be a sociopath, to want to help the world to be in philanthropy, for instance, right. To, to, to, to actually to be this, I mean, you're already, if you're devoting your life, if you are a, you know, a smart person who, you know, got a good degree, who could work more or less anywhere, but you decide to work for, for a charity, right? You're already an outlier. You're already somebody who said no to Wall Street or no to Hollywood or no to something, and now you're working for the, you know, the Southern Poverty Law Center or something like, you want to just stop racism, right? So, you're already one of the good guys. | '''Sam:''' 00:40:01 Yeah. No. So, but so, but when you're talking about the normal person who, I think it is a frequent phenomenon , to have, you know, normal, the normal range of good intentions to not be a sociopath, to want to help the world to be in philanthropy, for instance, right. To, to, to, to actually to be this, I mean, you're already, if you're devoting your life, if you are a, you know, a smart person who, you know, got a good degree, who could work more or less anywhere, but you decide to work for, for a charity, right? You're already an outlier. You're already somebody who said no to Wall Street or no to Hollywood or no to something, and now you're working for the, you know, the Southern Poverty Law Center or something like, you want to just stop racism, right? So, you're already one of the good guys. | ||
| Line 344: | Line 344: | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:42:22 Well, let's be, let's put a finer point on it. They are now more likely to let the genie out of the bottle because of their bad behavior or to, you know, huff and puff on an ember that is the pathetic KU Klux Klan of 2019, right? To actually create something that could, it could turn into a roaring fire. I mean, this is a general feature, I often talk about this in terms of magnetic and true North where the angle of declination that separates them is very small at the equator but in Northern Canada it's very large. Right? | '''Eric:''' 00:42:22 Well, let's be, let's put a finer point on it. They are now more likely to let the genie out of the bottle because of their bad behavior or to, you know, huff and puff on an ember that is the pathetic KU Klux Klan of 2019, right? To actually create something that could, it could turn into a roaring fire. I mean, this is a general feature, I often talk about this in terms of magnetic and true North where the angle of declination that separates them is very small at the equator but in Northern Canada it's very large. Right? | ||
'''Sam''' And, and at the, at the pole South is everywhere. | '''Sam:''' And, and at the, at the pole South is everywhere. | ||
'''Eric''' Well, that's right. Yeah. Right. And so it's just the problem is, is that the institution, I mean, look, I've made this point elsewhere so a regular listeners will have heard it, but the concept of the embedded growth obligation, the ego of an institution, which is, it has to do work and grow in order to meet its mandates. | '''Eric:''' Well, that's right. Yeah. Right. And so it's just the problem is, is that the institution, I mean, look, I've made this point elsewhere so a regular listeners will have heard it, but the concept of the embedded growth obligation, the ego of an institution, which is, it has to do work and grow in order to meet its mandates. | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:43:27 That is the thing that has metastasized throughout our institutional structure. And so, it's not the Southern Poverty Law Center. I mean, that's particularly egregious, but the entire university system, every single measure you can take on that thing, looks like an intergenerational wealth transfer right down to the nondischargeability of student debt and bankruptcy. Well, the loading up of every university by administrators and the monopolization at the moment, almost 100% of our leading institutions are run by a baby boomer whereas the average age, in a different era of a university president, we could have most of them under gen X control and some of them under millennial control, there were university presidents in their thirties who had a huge impact. I mean, that is a system which has gone totally metastatic. | '''Eric:''' 00:43:27 That is the thing that has metastasized throughout our institutional structure. And so, it's not the Southern Poverty Law Center. I mean, that's particularly egregious, but the entire university system, every single measure you can take on that thing, looks like an intergenerational wealth transfer right down to the nondischargeability of student debt and bankruptcy. Well, the loading up of every university by administrators and the monopolization at the moment, almost 100% of our leading institutions are run by a baby boomer whereas the average age, in a different era of a university president, we could have most of them under gen X control and some of them under millennial control, there were university presidents in their thirties who had a huge impact. I mean, that is a system which has gone totally metastatic. | ||
| Line 356: | Line 356: | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:44:34 Yeah. I mean, the way costs have gone up there, you know, way outpacing inflation, | '''Sam:''' 00:44:34 Yeah. I mean, the way costs have gone up there, you know, way outpacing inflation, | ||
'''Eric''' Out pacing, medical. | '''Eric:''' Out pacing, medical. | ||
'''Sam''' and, yeah. Yeah. It's, it's amazing. And the fact that you can't discharge your debt in bankruptcy. | '''Sam:''' and, yeah. Yeah. It's, it's amazing. And the fact that you can't discharge your debt in bankruptcy. | ||
'''Eric''' It’s perfect. | '''Eric:''' It’s perfect. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah. And the fact that, you know, many of our friends who have spent a lot of time complaining about this, but the fact that you have whole fields that are essentially, you know, sham fields, right, that are in the humanities where it's just pseudo knowledge is being imparted to the next generation. And it's, it's not only its own, it's the walled garden of pseudo knowledge, it is a disparagement of real knowledge. Like, so like the, the anti-science, you know, moral panic that is happening in the humanities… | '''Sam:''' Yeah. And the fact that, you know, many of our friends who have spent a lot of time complaining about this, but the fact that you have whole fields that are essentially, you know, sham fields, right, that are in the humanities where it's just pseudo knowledge is being imparted to the next generation. And it's, it's not only its own, it's the walled garden of pseudo knowledge, it is a disparagement of real knowledge. Like, so like the, the anti-science, you know, moral panic that is happening in the humanities… | ||
'''Eric''' It is a fit memetic complex. | '''Eric:''' It is a fit memetic complex. | ||
'''Sam''' Well, it's, apparently, it's fit. It's fit thus far. I mean it's producing new graduates. Yeah. | '''Sam:''' Well, it's, apparently, it's fit. It's fit thus far. I mean it's producing new graduates. Yeah. | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:45:27 Well, and it's colonizing things outside of it. I mean the problem with journalism, tech, human resources, anything which is a high leverage but often poorly paid for the level of intelligence usually required or the amount of training usually required becomes attractive. So, there's a perverse incentive when you can't pay journalists or scientists or even technologists at appropriate levels. I know people will scream, so you have no idea how much money tech people get paid. And I, I really don't believe it. I think that those jobs are supposed to be even better compensated because of large scale tampering in the sector. | '''Eric:''' 00:45:27 Well, and it's colonizing things outside of it. I mean the problem with journalism, tech, human resources, anything which is a high leverage but often poorly paid for the level of intelligence usually required or the amount of training usually required becomes attractive. So, there's a perverse incentive when you can't pay journalists or scientists or even technologists at appropriate levels. I know people will scream, so you have no idea how much money tech people get paid. And I, I really don't believe it. I think that those jobs are supposed to be even better compensated because of large scale tampering in the sector. | ||
| Line 374: | Line 374: | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:46:33 But we have a hand in this so we can tune the landscape, right? | '''Sam:''' 00:46:33 But we have a hand in this so we can tune the landscape, right? | ||
'''Eric''' Sometimes I feel like the two of us. Yeah. That's why I call you Sam. What the hell is going on? | '''Eric:''' Sometimes I feel like the two of us. Yeah. That's why I call you Sam. What the hell is going on? | ||
'''Sam''' Yes. A relatively small number of people can do it. It's not, it's not, it doesn't take 7 billion people or 8 billion people. No, but like you, you need to convince the top, you know, 3000 people that one way of talking doesn't work. Right. And to, to, to align fitness and truth more faithfully. | '''Sam:''' Yes. A relatively small number of people can do it. It's not, it's not, it doesn't take 7 billion people or 8 billion people. No, but like you, you need to convince the top, you know, 3000 people that one way of talking doesn't work. Right. And to, to, to align fitness and truth more faithfully. | ||
'''Eric''' You know, I mean, I'm not used to disagreeing with you this much. | '''Eric:''' You know, I mean, I'm not used to disagreeing with you this much. | ||
'''Sam''' Good. That's why I came here with my alter-ego. Yeah. | '''Sam:''' Good. That's why I came here with my alter-ego. Yeah. | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:47:13 Sam, I think we've screwed up a lot worse than you're imagining in the past. And that that is the fodder for the twin evils of Trumpism and Wokeism. | '''Eric:''' 00:47:13 Sam, I think we've screwed up a lot worse than you're imagining in the past. And that that is the fodder for the twin evils of Trumpism and Wokeism. | ||
| Line 386: | Line 386: | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:47:26 But just, just grant me the, the possible sea change effect of the 3000 people, the right 3000 people, fundamentally getting their head straight on, on these issues or any issue, right. Whatever it is. So, you're talking about basically all of Hollywood, all of journalism and all of the science that's public facing. | '''Sam:''' 00:47:26 But just, just grant me the, the possible sea change effect of the 3000 people, the right 3000 people, fundamentally getting their head straight on, on these issues or any issue, right. Whatever it is. So, you're talking about basically all of Hollywood, all of journalism and all of the science that's public facing. | ||
'''Eric''' If we could do that. | '''Eric:''' If we could do that. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah. | '''Sam:''' Yeah. | ||
'''Eric''' Okay. In some, some thought experiment? Yeah. I guess what my feeling is, first of all is, is that my head is so filled with malware. I've got, I'm running so many nonsensical programs put there by other people that I don't even know are nonsense. Or I can detect... | '''Eric:''' Okay. In some, some thought experiment? Yeah. I guess what my feeling is, first of all is, is that my head is so filled with malware. I've got, I'm running so many nonsensical programs put there by other people that I don't even know are nonsense. Or I can detect... | ||
'''Sam''' you have a sense of what direction to point you're going to find the nonsense. What are you worried about? | '''Sam:''' you have a sense of what direction to point you're going to find the nonsense. What are you worried about? | ||
'''Eric''' well, so we're currently sitting in a room with reflective glass and anechoic tiles that deaden sound. If I echolocate by things that I am absolutely positive would sell newspapers that aren't printed, it's like, okay, you're echolocating and instead of hearing the reflection off of glass, you're hearing a, an absence, which is anechoic tile. And so, if I just look at Google trends, which tells me what people are searching on, if I look at how Google autocompletes, which tells me what they want me to see is what other people are searching on in the search bar. If I look at what stories aren't being run, all of the dead stuff is astounding to me right at the moment. | '''Eric:''' well, so we're currently sitting in a room with reflective glass and anechoic tiles that deaden sound. If I echolocate by things that I am absolutely positive would sell newspapers that aren't printed, it's like, okay, you're echolocating and instead of hearing the reflection off of glass, you're hearing a, an absence, which is anechoic tile. And so, if I just look at Google trends, which tells me what people are searching on, if I look at how Google autocompletes, which tells me what they want me to see is what other people are searching on in the search bar. If I look at what stories aren't being run, all of the dead stuff is astounding to me right at the moment. | ||
Like I know for example that people are fascinated by the Jeffrey Epstein story. And in general, like you know, we just had, so normally I don't love talking about current events because it dates the program, but we just had a Kevin Spacey's accuser reported as dying. I don't think that that is likely to be part of some super evil plot to just so people can calibrate. It's not that everything that could make sense because there's an incentive, I chalk up to a conspiracy. | Like I know for example that people are fascinated by the Jeffrey Epstein story. And in general, like you know, we just had, so normally I don't love talking about current events because it dates the program, but we just had a Kevin Spacey's accuser reported as dying. I don't think that that is likely to be part of some super evil plot to just so people can calibrate. It's not that everything that could make sense because there's an incentive, I chalk up to a conspiracy. | ||
| Line 400: | Line 400: | ||
The Jeffrey Epstein thing is totally different and you and I both met this guy. For 15 years, and he's the only person I've been saying this with conviction about for 15 years, I had one meeting with him, I've said he's a construct. Somebody hired a person probably named Jeffrey Epstein to play a role, super genius mega billionaire philanthropist. I wasn't buying any of it, I've never bought it. And I've talked to everybody in our sort of mutual network and always used one word because I wanted to make a huge bet that when the time came, I would say he was a construct and that I would be revealed to be correct. And that everybody was asked, what do you mean by a construct? Right. Okay. | The Jeffrey Epstein thing is totally different and you and I both met this guy. For 15 years, and he's the only person I've been saying this with conviction about for 15 years, I had one meeting with him, I've said he's a construct. Somebody hired a person probably named Jeffrey Epstein to play a role, super genius mega billionaire philanthropist. I wasn't buying any of it, I've never bought it. And I've talked to everybody in our sort of mutual network and always used one word because I wanted to make a huge bet that when the time came, I would say he was a construct and that I would be revealed to be correct. And that everybody was asked, what do you mean by a construct? Right. Okay. | ||
'''Sam''' Do you need to have you clarify that on your podcast before? | '''Sam:''' Do you need to have you clarify that on your podcast before? | ||
'''Eric''' Probably not. I, I recorded an entire Jeffrey Epstein episode, which is just me soloing for an hour, but I haven't released it cause I'm terrified. And I've had one ambiguous dinner where somebody sort of quasi threatened me and I wasn't entirely sure what they were saying. It was a little bit creepy. | '''Eric:''' Probably not. I, I recorded an entire Jeffrey Epstein episode, which is just me soloing for an hour, but I haven't released it cause I'm terrified. And I've had one ambiguous dinner where somebody sort of quasi threatened me and I wasn't entirely sure what they were saying. It was a little bit creepy. | ||
'''Sam''' Well this is a strand of human complication that you're way more in touch with than I am. I don't deny that it exists. Right. So, like, I think there are real conspiracies and the, and powerful people occasionally, you know, do what, powerful people are occasionally sociopaths and then they, then they do what you would expect or conspired to do what you'd expect. So, I don't have a strong feeling about let's just take the livelihood that Epstein was, was had a facilitated suicide. I think the likelihood that he was murdered is low, but I'll commit suicide. I don't have a strong | '''Sam:''' Well this is a strand of human complication that you're way more in touch with than I am. I don't deny that it exists. Right. So, like, I think there are real conspiracies and the, and powerful people occasionally, you know, do what, powerful people are occasionally sociopaths and then they, then they do what you would expect or conspired to do what you'd expect. So, I don't have a strong feeling about let's just take the livelihood that Epstein was, was had a facilitated suicide. I think the likelihood that he was murdered is low, but I'll commit suicide. I don't have a strong | ||
'''Eric''' I’m agnostic about that, whether some people stepped away so that he could do the thing that he needed to do, whether there's some vanishing probability that he actually isn't dead. I don't know. | '''Eric:''' I’m agnostic about that, whether some people stepped away so that he could do the thing that he needed to do, whether there's some vanishing probability that he actually isn't dead. I don't know. | ||
'''Sam''' I put that at very low. | '''Sam:''' I put that at very low. | ||
'''Eric''' I put that very low odds as well. | '''Eric:''' I put that very low odds as well. | ||
'''Sam''' But you put no, I'm a fan of the … | '''Sam:''' But you put no, I'm a fan of the … | ||
'''Eric''' Do you put it at zero odds, Sam? | '''Eric:''' Do you put it at zero odds, Sam? | ||
'''Sam''' Well I wouldn't, I know enough about probability to put almost nothing and zero. | '''Sam:''' Well I wouldn't, I know enough about probability to put almost nothing and zero. | ||
Eric It’s a huge, huge difference between those people who insist, when I hear somebody insists that that probability be zero, I take it and that person is smart, | Eric It’s a huge, huge difference between those people who insist, when I hear somebody insists that that probability be zero, I take it and that person is smart, | ||
'''Sam''' But effectively, effectively zero. I mean zero in the sense that we don't have time to worry about it. | '''Sam:''' But effectively, effectively zero. I mean zero in the sense that we don't have time to worry about it. | ||
'''Eric''' I wasted no time thinking about it at the moment, but I'm happy to have my Basie and priors tutored. | '''Eric:''' I wasted no time thinking about it at the moment, but I'm happy to have my Basie and priors tutored. | ||
'''Sam''' Right. | '''Sam:''' Right. | ||
'''Eric''' Okay. | '''Eric:''' Okay. | ||
'''Sam''' So, I just don't have a, I mean, as you know, I'm taking in or, or I utilize this homily that you, you shouldn't describe to, to malice what can be explained by incompetence or whatever that the formulation is. | '''Sam:''' So, I just don't have a, I mean, as you know, I'm taking in or, or I utilize this homily that you, you shouldn't describe to, to malice what can be explained by incompetence or whatever that the formulation is. | ||
''''''Eric''' 00:52:10 I find that that's an interesting heuristic for somebody. | ''''''Eric:''' 00:52:10 I find that that's an interesting heuristic for somebody. | ||
'''Sam''' It's, it's usually, I think it's usually true, right? So, like it works much of the time and then it, it fails, but it fails in a case where you get more information and then you update your view. | '''Sam:''' It's, it's usually, I think it's usually true, right? So, like it works much of the time and then it, it fails, but it fails in a case where you get more information and then you update your view. | ||
'''Eric''' That's what that was. That was exactly my point that the Kevin Spacey thing I would say is in the realm of Newtonian mechanics. And then the Jeff Epstein thing is like relativistic quantum field theory. Whatever your Newtonian laws are, we're not in Kansas anymore. | '''Eric:''' That's what that was. That was exactly my point that the Kevin Spacey thing I would say is in the realm of Newtonian mechanics. And then the Jeff Epstein thing is like relativistic quantum field theory. Whatever your Newtonian laws are, we're not in Kansas anymore. | ||
'''Sam''' But I had no, you put me in the same room with him. So, I should probably clarify that. So, I had, I've found myself, but | '''Sam:''' But I had no, you put me in the same room with him. So, I should probably clarify that. So, I had, I've found myself, but | ||
'''Eric''' We should both apologize. Nothing happened. | '''Eric:''' We should both apologize. Nothing happened. | ||
'''Sam''' I found myself at a lunch with him at the TED conference and had no insight into him or what he was up to apart from the fact that he, you know, my sort of creep detector went off, | '''Sam:''' I found myself at a lunch with him at the TED conference and had no insight into him or what he was up to apart from the fact that he, you know, my sort of creep detector went off, | ||
Eric Mine spiked like crazy. | Eric Mine spiked like crazy. | ||
| Line 452: | Line 452: | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:54:21 From one meeting I've been I've been talking about him for 15 years. | '''Eric:''' 00:54:21 From one meeting I've been I've been talking about him for 15 years. | ||
'''Sam''' Right, because this was like a 10-person lunch. Okay. And I had maybe, you know, three sentences exchange with him. | '''Sam:''' Right, because this was like a 10-person lunch. Okay. And I had maybe, you know, three sentences exchange with him. | ||
'''Eric''' You know, so mine was at his house, right. I'm ushered into a waiting room. He's got some super complicated electronical electronic art. I get up, I look at it and I say, wait, is that, is that a camera inside the art? I, the first thing, I'm a genius for finding the cameras. I inside, my next thought is I'm supposed to find the camera inside the art because the cam, the art is supposed to draw my attention and I'm supposed to see that I'm being recorded. | '''Eric:''' You know, so mine was at his house, right. I'm ushered into a waiting room. He's got some super complicated electronical electronic art. I get up, I look at it and I say, wait, is that, is that a camera inside the art? I, the first thing, I'm a genius for finding the cameras. I inside, my next thought is I'm supposed to find the camera inside the art because the cam, the art is supposed to draw my attention and I'm supposed to see that I'm being recorded. | ||
I'm called out to a room in back with a huge long, it's sort of exaggerated dining table with a giant American flag as its tablecloth, so that any food or drink that is served on it may spill onto an American flag. And I'm just in high alert, like, fuck you. Who, who, who are you? | I'm called out to a room in back with a huge long, it's sort of exaggerated dining table with a giant American flag as its tablecloth, so that any food or drink that is served on it may spill onto an American flag. And I'm just in high alert, like, fuck you. Who, who, who are you? | ||
| Line 464: | Line 464: | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:56:05 No, no, this is incredibly important distinction and I don't think that the news media has done a good job of teasing out. It's very attached to the idea of Pedophile Island and Lolita Express. And that lazy, sensationalist journalism is crowding something out, which is that in general from what I understand, so, I met him in 2000, I think 2004, maybe 2003 but before his Florida incarceration and charges, most people that I knew who met him met him with young adult women. And so, my theory is that he was constructed to be the sapiosexual Hugh Hefner. | '''Eric:''' 00:56:05 No, no, this is incredibly important distinction and I don't think that the news media has done a good job of teasing out. It's very attached to the idea of Pedophile Island and Lolita Express. And that lazy, sensationalist journalism is crowding something out, which is that in general from what I understand, so, I met him in 2000, I think 2004, maybe 2003 but before his Florida incarceration and charges, most people that I knew who met him met him with young adult women. And so, my theory is that he was constructed to be the sapiosexual Hugh Hefner. | ||
'''Sam''' Right. | '''Sam:''' Right. | ||
'''Eric''' And that they stupidly hired probably, and I guess I don't know this Humbert Humbert for the role and that, that dichotomy explains at least a lot of the initial willingness of the science community to play with this person. That, I mean, I'll be honest, I'm not particularly judgmental about consenting adults, even if it's probably ill-advised. You know, to have a 50-year spread between two people. If somebody is 20 and somebody who's 80 ... | '''Eric:''' And that they stupidly hired probably, and I guess I don't know this Humbert Humbert for the role and that, that dichotomy explains at least a lot of the initial willingness of the science community to play with this person. That, I mean, I'll be honest, I'm not particularly judgmental about consenting adults, even if it's probably ill-advised. You know, to have a 50-year spread between two people. If somebody is 20 and somebody who's 80 ... | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:57:15 There's just, it's a completely different thing is it's very easy to see that if you've seen this guy be sort of the womanizing schmuck, right within the bounds of, you know, total legality and he's surrounded by 20 year olds and you know, he's got a 40 year... | '''Sam:''' 00:57:15 There's just, it's a completely different thing is it's very easy to see that if you've seen this guy be sort of the womanizing schmuck, right within the bounds of, you know, total legality and he's surrounded by 20 year olds and you know, he's got a 40 year... | ||
'''Eric''' Everybody's party to the game. | '''Eric:''' Everybody's party to the game. | ||
'''Sam''' You would never, you would never suspect this other thing about him. Right. Okay. | '''Sam:''' You would never, you would never suspect this other thing about him. Right. Okay. | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:57:35 That is not a fair defense after the Florida situation, the Florida situation changes that structure. | '''Eric:''' 00:57:35 That is not a fair defense after the Florida situation, the Florida situation changes that structure. | ||
| Line 480: | Line 480: | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:57:51 No, no, no. The prosecution. | '''Eric:''' 00:57:51 No, no, no. The prosecution. | ||
'''Sam''' Right. | '''Sam:''' Right. | ||
'''Eric''' So, a lot of people continued to talk to him in part because, and I think this is something that hasn't been teased out, he was supporting an older style of science, which this is again, something that's gonna be super complicated, was much more disagreeable. Now the woke movement has seized on this as well, that's the cowboy oppressive science of male assholes. But he was supporting a network of people who might not have been supported otherwise to somewhat break out of the mold. And because the U.S. government had stepped away from that work in, in, in large measure, in my opinion, people were so dependent on him that they were eager to look the other way. And there was also the hint, I think that this wasn't really Jeffrey Epstein, that this was really something else funding. | '''Eric:''' So, a lot of people continued to talk to him in part because, and I think this is something that hasn't been teased out, he was supporting an older style of science, which this is again, something that's gonna be super complicated, was much more disagreeable. Now the woke movement has seized on this as well, that's the cowboy oppressive science of male assholes. But he was supporting a network of people who might not have been supported otherwise to somewhat break out of the mold. And because the U.S. government had stepped away from that work in, in, in large measure, in my opinion, people were so dependent on him that they were eager to look the other way. And there was also the hint, I think that this wasn't really Jeffrey Epstein, that this was really something else funding. | ||
'''Sam:''' 00:58:48 Hmm. Well, I dunno about that. I mean, I, I think the, the relative penury of science is a corrupting variable and the fact that we, we underfund science and that it matters that when the rich guy comes into the room, right to, to scientists because they're so starved for money, that's just, that's just corrupting. | '''Sam:''' 00:58:48 Hmm. Well, I dunno about that. I mean, I, I think the, the relative penury of science is a corrupting variable and the fact that we, we underfund science and that it matters that when the rich guy comes into the room, right to, to scientists because they're so starved for money, that's just, that's just corrupting. | ||
| Line 488: | Line 488: | ||
'''Eric:''' 00:59:09 Look, this is, I, I've been on this, this is going to get us into the immigration question, which is that the in the mid-eighties, under Reagan, the science complex particularly the National Science Foundation under Eric Block through the National Academy of Sciences and a subdivision called the Government University Industry Research Round table, GUIRR, are conspired to destroy the bargaining power of American scientists by flooding the market. And what they did is they did an economic analysis with both supply and demand curves to say that the wages, which you can calculate when you have two intersecting curves, we're going to go above six figures for new PhDs. | '''Eric:''' 00:59:09 Look, this is, I, I've been on this, this is going to get us into the immigration question, which is that the in the mid-eighties, under Reagan, the science complex particularly the National Science Foundation under Eric Block through the National Academy of Sciences and a subdivision called the Government University Industry Research Round table, GUIRR, are conspired to destroy the bargaining power of American scientists by flooding the market. And what they did is they did an economic analysis with both supply and demand curves to say that the wages, which you can calculate when you have two intersecting curves, we're going to go above six figures for new PhDs. | ||
'''Sam''' And then let's get a lot of Indians in here? | '''Sam:''' And then let's get a lot of Indians in here? | ||
"Eric" And well, it's four, it was four countries. It was China, India, Taiwan and Korea. And China went from zero to 60 in like, no, they were sending us nobody, and then I think there were like over 25% of all graduate students. And of course, graduate students aren't students, they're workers. So, there's a cryptic labor economy inside of the universities. And what the university system figured out was, is that in order to get this work done, we'd have to have this, these misclassified students who do the work. important. It is foreign workers. And what we would do is we would take the economic analysis, which they secretly did in 1986 and they'd subtract off the demand curve and they'd just do a supply analysis based on the demography of the baby boom going into the baby bust, which is our generation, Gen X. And that demographic alarm was sounded to get the immigration act of 1990 passed, which has like the H1B is one of its most famous features. So that's, that's a whole story about how the actual workings, I'm the guy who uncovered that and I chased that all the way down to the person who wrote that secret study that was never released, never dated, never authored. | "Eric" And well, it's four, it was four countries. It was China, India, Taiwan and Korea. And China went from zero to 60 in like, no, they were sending us nobody, and then I think there were like over 25% of all graduate students. And of course, graduate students aren't students, they're workers. So, there's a cryptic labor economy inside of the universities. And what the university system figured out was, is that in order to get this work done, we'd have to have this, these misclassified students who do the work. important. It is foreign workers. And what we would do is we would take the economic analysis, which they secretly did in 1986 and they'd subtract off the demand curve and they'd just do a supply analysis based on the demography of the baby boom going into the baby bust, which is our generation, Gen X. And that demographic alarm was sounded to get the immigration act of 1990 passed, which has like the H1B is one of its most famous features. So that's, that's a whole story about how the actual workings, I'm the guy who uncovered that and I chased that all the way down to the person who wrote that secret study that was never released, never dated, never authored. | ||
'''Sam''' Right. | '''Sam:''' Right. | ||
'''Eric''' That thing was the stepping away of the federal government from its con, its commitment through the Vannevar Bush endless frontier agreement to fund the kickass blue-sky research that this country has done better than anyone else. | '''Eric:''' That thing was the stepping away of the federal government from its con, its commitment through the Vannevar Bush endless frontier agreement to fund the kickass blue-sky research that this country has done better than anyone else. | ||
'''Sam:''' 01:01:27 But how is that distinguishable from what on his face seems to me to be a rational policy, which is why not try to attract the world's best and brightest and incentivize them to start their businesses here, settle here, you know what, once you've gotten your PhD at Harvard, you know, you, you've got a green card and you know, here's your, here's the Silicon Valley's over there. You know what I mean? So why when ... | '''Sam:''' 01:01:27 But how is that distinguishable from what on his face seems to me to be a rational policy, which is why not try to attract the world's best and brightest and incentivize them to start their businesses here, settle here, you know what, once you've gotten your PhD at Harvard, you know, you, you've got a green card and you know, here's your, here's the Silicon Valley's over there. You know what I mean? So why when ... | ||
| Line 502: | Line 502: | ||
'''Sam:''' 01:02:05 No, but no, but no, my, my point is that strikes me as a good policy, even though that would create more competition for, you know, so-called Americans, right? Because we're, we're now open for, for the world's business. But if you actually wanted to maximize, you know, creativity and, and industry here, you would want to import Indians and Chinese and Taiwanese and Koreans. | '''Sam:''' 01:02:05 No, but no, but no, my, my point is that strikes me as a good policy, even though that would create more competition for, you know, so-called Americans, right? Because we're, we're now open for, for the world's business. But if you actually wanted to maximize, you know, creativity and, and industry here, you would want to import Indians and Chinese and Taiwanese and Koreans. | ||
'''Eric''' Well, I mean, look, I've married the maximum number of brilliant women from the developing world who came here to do STEM that the law will allow. So I'm absolutely guilty. | '''Eric:''' Well, I mean, look, I've married the maximum number of brilliant women from the developing world who came here to do STEM that the law will allow. So I'm absolutely guilty. | ||
'''Sam''' You got your wife and then you want to close the border? | '''Sam:''' You got your wife and then you want to close the border? | ||
'''Eric''' What? Yeah. Well, first of all, that's how country clubs work, right? Right. So, the idea is that when you get country club, when you get into a country club, you don't instantly say, well, I don't understand. It would be immoral for me to close the country club. | '''Eric:''' What? Yeah. Well, first of all, that's how country clubs work, right? Right. So, the idea is that when you get country club, when you get into a country club, you don't instantly say, well, I don't understand. It would be immoral for me to close the country club. | ||
'''Eric:''' 01:03:01 I mean, so it's a very weird thing for me that people who are very steeped in what you were just talking about, which is this interesting mimetic complex that got pushed out don't tend to think critically about it. Of course, we want the best people in the world to come to the U S selfishly. | '''Eric:''' 01:03:01 I mean, so it's a very weird thing for me that people who are very steeped in what you were just talking about, which is this interesting mimetic complex that got pushed out don't tend to think critically about it. Of course, we want the best people in the world to come to the U S selfishly. | ||
| Line 512: | Line 512: | ||
'''Sam:''' I mean, you know, everyone doesn't, I mean, the person who has to compete with the best coming from India and Taiwan and China. Yeah. That person, let's say in, in a, you know, software engineering, that person has found, now suddenly on a much more competitive playing field. | '''Sam:''' I mean, you know, everyone doesn't, I mean, the person who has to compete with the best coming from India and Taiwan and China. Yeah. That person, let's say in, in a, you know, software engineering, that person has found, now suddenly on a much more competitive playing field. | ||
'''Eric''' And yeah, this is, this is... So what I was told about this, | '''Eric:''' And yeah, this is, this is... So what I was told about this, | ||
'''Sam''' But I'm just not, I'm not saying that it's not without cost to somebody. It's definitely costing somebody something. Right? | '''Sam:''' But I'm just not, I'm not saying that it's not without cost to somebody. It's definitely costing somebody something. Right? | ||
'''Eric''' Like the bad people, the people. | '''Eric:''' Like the bad people, the people. | ||
'''Sam''' No, no, no. Not the bad people, but just, it's, it's like | '''Sam:''' No, no, no. Not the bad people, but just, it's, it's like | ||
'''Eric''' I don't even know how to go into all of the things that are like really funny and wrong about this. Like one of which is, well are you afraid to compete with somebody from India? Well, maybe I'm afraid to compete with a hundred people from India. You know, like the issue is what is your your price point... | '''Eric:''' I don't even know how to go into all of the things that are like really funny and wrong about this. Like one of which is, well are you afraid to compete with somebody from India? Well, maybe I'm afraid to compete with a hundred people from India. You know, like the issue is what is your your price point... | ||
'''Sam''' You are though, on this podcast, you're competing with people from India. I mean you're competing with, you know, there are 800,000 podcasts. | '''Sam:''' You are though, on this podcast, you're competing with people from India. I mean you're competing with, you know, there are 800,000 podcasts. | ||
'''Eric''' No, no. | '''Eric:''' No, no. | ||
'''Sam''' You're, you're competing with, with 799,999... | '''Sam:''' You're, you're competing with, with 799,999... | ||
'''Eric''' Because it's not a uniform, because it's not a uniform product. Sam. | '''Eric:''' Because it's not a uniform, because it's not a uniform product. Sam. | ||
'''Sam''' No, but you still... | '''Sam:''' No, but you still... | ||
'''Eric''' When you talked about software, right, most of software is glorified foreign while loops. Let's not, you know, you, you, you, you invoke a library, you code up a class. | '''Eric:''' When you talked about software, right, most of software is glorified foreign while loops. Let's not, you know, you, you, you, you invoke a library, you code up a class. | ||
'''Sam''' You can outsource it. All right. | '''Sam:''' You can outsource it. All right. | ||
'''Eric''' Well no, it's just, I'm just saying that most of what it is you're just writing code. It's got a kind of a mystique about it because a lot of people haven't done it and it's too symbolic, whatever. | '''Eric:''' Well no, it's just, I'm just saying that most of what it is you're just writing code. It's got a kind of a mystique about it because a lot of people haven't done it and it's too symbolic, whatever. | ||
'''Sam''' But it's plumbing. | '''Sam:''' But it's plumbing. | ||
'''Eric''' It's plumbing and a lot of science is plumbing. Yeah. And so, a lot of the stuff about the best is not very relevant. If you wanted to take the stuff that's really distinguished, you know, like you've got Rama NuGen coming from India, you know you've got you know, Ellis coming from South Africa who, whoever it is, that's really amazing, we have plenty of room for the tiny number of people who are absolutely nonhomogeneous super contributors. | '''Eric:''' It's plumbing and a lot of science is plumbing. Yeah. And so, a lot of the stuff about the best is not very relevant. If you wanted to take the stuff that's really distinguished, you know, like you've got Rama NuGen coming from India, you know you've got you know, Ellis coming from South Africa who, whoever it is, that's really amazing, we have plenty of room for the tiny number of people who are absolutely nonhomogeneous super contributors. | ||
'''Sam''' So, you're just saying you want to set the bar higher. | '''Sam:''' So, you're just saying you want to set the bar higher. | ||
'''Eric''' I'm not saying that, I'm saying a lot of different things. One is that people in the country have rights and they have asymmetric rights to their own labor market. That's a large part of what it means to be a citizen of a country. If I start to talk about your rights that are perhaps your most valuable economic possession, if you really think about the American workers, most valuable economic possession is asymmetric access to the American labor market. If I say, you know, your right is not an asset, but is instead an impediment, it's a barrier. And what we need to do is get rid of the red tape and I'm not going to pay you for it because it's not an asset. | '''Eric:''' I'm not saying that, I'm saying a lot of different things. One is that people in the country have rights and they have asymmetric rights to their own labor market. That's a large part of what it means to be a citizen of a country. If I start to talk about your rights that are perhaps your most valuable economic possession, if you really think about the American workers, most valuable economic possession is asymmetric access to the American labor market. If I say, you know, your right is not an asset, but is instead an impediment, it's a barrier. And what we need to do is get rid of the red tape and I'm not going to pay you for it because it's not an asset. | ||
I'm going to take it from you and I'm going to say that that's what the free market is. Well, that has nothing to do with the free market. I wrote a paper called Migration for the Benefit of All that pointed out you're free to securitize people's right and pay for it. And then everybody wins. | I'm going to take it from you and I'm going to say that that's what the free market is. Well, that has nothing to do with the free market. I wrote a paper called Migration for the Benefit of All that pointed out you're free to securitize people's right and pay for it. And then everybody wins. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah. | '''Sam:''' Yeah. | ||
'''Eric''' That's not what we do. | '''Eric:''' That's not what we do. | ||
'''Sam''' Okay, so, but that's, that's something we could do though. We could... | '''Sam:''' Okay, so, but that's, that's something we could do though. We could... | ||
'''Eric''' We're not interested. That would be a Coase, that's called a Coasean solution. | '''Eric:''' We're not interested. That would be a Coase, that's called a Coasean solution. | ||
'''Sam''' Right. | '''Sam:''' Right. | ||
'''Eric''' And the funny part about it, the, the hysterically funny part about it is that no capitalists who claim that they're interested in getting rid of the inefficiency that comes from being forced to use your own labor are interested in the model in which you actually pay people for their securitized rights. Because the real thing they're interested in is not the tiny inefficiency, which is called the Harberger triangle. | '''Eric:''' And the funny part about it, the, the hysterically funny part about it is that no capitalists who claim that they're interested in getting rid of the inefficiency that comes from being forced to use your own labor are interested in the model in which you actually pay people for their securitized rights. Because the real thing they're interested in is not the tiny inefficiency, which is called the Harberger triangle. | ||
'''Eric:''' 01:07:00 There's a giant structure below it called the Morehouse rectangle, which is what is transferred from labor to capital. | '''Eric:''' 01:07:00 There's a giant structure below it called the Morehouse rectangle, which is what is transferred from labor to capital. | ||
'''Sam''' The amazing thing is you've referenced this several times over cocktails. | '''Sam:''' The amazing thing is you've referenced this several times over cocktails. | ||
'''Eric''' Yeah. | '''Eric:''' Yeah. | ||
'''Sam''' In the last two years. | '''Sam:''' In the last two years. | ||
'''Eric''' Yeah. Well, but, but my point... | '''Eric:''' Yeah. Well, but, but my point... | ||
'''Sam''' This is cocktail party chatter... | '''Sam:''' This is cocktail party chatter... | ||
'''Eric''' No. But I see it, I see it differently. | '''Eric:''' No. But I see it, I see it differently. | ||
'''Sam''' ... the Weinstein family. | '''Sam:''' ... the Weinstein family. | ||
'''Eric''' Sam, I see your comment that well don't we want the best and the brightest where you don't reference wage competition. It sounds more like intellectual competition, right? When you, when you, when you open a border and selectively only in certain fields, it's like opening a window in an airplane and it specifically affects the seat at which it's opened differently than everywhere else in the plane. Right? | '''Eric:''' Sam, I see your comment that well don't we want the best and the brightest where you don't reference wage competition. It sounds more like intellectual competition, right? When you, when you, when you open a border and selectively only in certain fields, it's like opening a window in an airplane and it specifically affects the seat at which it's opened differently than everywhere else in the plane. Right? | ||
'''Sam''' Right. | '''Sam:''' Right. | ||
'''Eric''' So, the problem I have with this is that it's a large mimetic complex and get it popping back up to the Jeff Epstein issue. The entire university and scientific complex was built on this incredible embedded growth obligation, right? | '''Eric:''' So, the problem I have with this is that it's a large mimetic complex and get it popping back up to the Jeff Epstein issue. The entire university and scientific complex was built on this incredible embedded growth obligation, right? | ||
'''Eric:''' 01:08:01 That is the thing that caused the system to have to rescue itself with immigration. So, it's really not about immigration or brown people or I don't want to compete against the best and the prizes. It, the issue was we didn't have enough people to feed into a pyramid system. And what you could do is you could, you could reference a poverty differential between Asia, which was training people acceptably well in technical subjects, but had it at a lower level, now that's changed some to fill in the bottom of the pyramid. And so that's really what it was. It was an economic X point that has nothing to do with the best and the brightest or the color of one's skin. It was just a way of saving a pyramid scheme. | '''Eric:''' 01:08:01 That is the thing that caused the system to have to rescue itself with immigration. So, it's really not about immigration or brown people or I don't want to compete against the best and the prizes. It, the issue was we didn't have enough people to feed into a pyramid system. And what you could do is you could, you could reference a poverty differential between Asia, which was training people acceptably well in technical subjects, but had it at a lower level, now that's changed some to fill in the bottom of the pyramid. And so that's really what it was. It was an economic X point that has nothing to do with the best and the brightest or the color of one's skin. It was just a way of saving a pyramid scheme. | ||
| Line 652: | Line 652: | ||
'''Eric:''' 01:19:23 And the idea is we'd tell you what we're doing, but we'd have to kill you. | '''Eric:''' 01:19:23 And the idea is we'd tell you what we're doing, but we'd have to kill you. | ||
'''Sam''' Right. | '''Sam:''' Right. | ||
'''Eric''' The, we, we just didn't know. And I, I got Madoff wrong. I thought he was front running his legitimate business, which turns out it was just a Ponzi scheme. | '''Eric:''' The, we, we just didn't know. And I, I got Madoff wrong. I thought he was front running his legitimate business, which turns out it was just a Ponzi scheme. | ||
'''Sam''' Right. | '''Sam:''' Right. | ||
'''Eric''' But I knew Epstein was very likely to be something totally other than he was. Nassim during this period of time that we were both discussing the nonsense. That was the suppose great moderation, was the other guy who would take as much punishment as the community would throw at him and then would just humiliate him. It's like, Oh, he made one lucky trade in 1987 the guy's an idiot. He's a blowhard. He's a fool. And I couldn't take the pressure from giving this talk that obviously we hadn't banished volatility. And I think around 2005, I was about three years in and Nassim says, you know, you're going to regret getting out of this early. | '''Eric:''' But I knew Epstein was very likely to be something totally other than he was. Nassim during this period of time that we were both discussing the nonsense. That was the suppose great moderation, was the other guy who would take as much punishment as the community would throw at him and then would just humiliate him. It's like, Oh, he made one lucky trade in 1987 the guy's an idiot. He's a blowhard. He's a fool. And I couldn't take the pressure from giving this talk that obviously we hadn't banished volatility. And I think around 2005, I was about three years in and Nassim says, you know, you're going to regret getting out of this early. | ||
'''Eric:''' 01:20:15 You should see it through. And it always stuck with me that I didn't quite have the courage or the strength or the guts or the disagreability to continue, at least to hold the intellectual position. I couldn't time when this thing was going to blow, but it was, you know, I wrote this thing on mortgage backed securities with Adil, Abdullah Ali in 2001. This was nonsense. And it was a world in which almost no one was willing to call it out. And so, the singularity in my, in my world about Nassim has to do with he, he's willing to be one person against billions. He will, he will literally just stand up against any crowd. | '''Eric:''' 01:20:15 You should see it through. And it always stuck with me that I didn't quite have the courage or the strength or the guts or the disagreability to continue, at least to hold the intellectual position. I couldn't time when this thing was going to blow, but it was, you know, I wrote this thing on mortgage backed securities with Adil, Abdullah Ali in 2001. This was nonsense. And it was a world in which almost no one was willing to call it out. And so, the singularity in my, in my world about Nassim has to do with he, he's willing to be one person against billions. He will, he will literally just stand up against any crowd. | ||
| Line 664: | Line 664: | ||
'''Sam:''' 01:20:58 Okay, well, so that's, that's often a bug. And you found the one case perhaps where it was a feature, but it's a, I mean, first of all, we're all like that to some degree. I mean, we were, we're all standing up, right? | '''Sam:''' 01:20:58 Okay, well, so that's, that's often a bug. And you found the one case perhaps where it was a feature, but it's a, I mean, first of all, we're all like that to some degree. I mean, we were, we're all standing up, right? | ||
'''Eric''' It's very hard for me. | '''Eric:''' It's very hard for me. | ||
'''Sam''' And, yeah, but it... | '''Sam:''' And, yeah, but it... | ||
'''Eric''' I mean, I, I do it and you do it, but you don't get weak-kneed. I get weak-kneed. | '''Eric:''' I mean, I, I do it and you do it, but you don't get weak-kneed. I get weak-kneed. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah, occasionally. But it's, it's, there is a kind, I mean, again, I'm a, not to psychoanalyze him, but there's this, there's a sort of Trumpian level personality problem layered on top of his intellect where, I'm not disputing the guy is smart, he's a, there's no question, he's smart, but there's just, there's so much personality to get through and wrangle with, to interact with whatever, whatever smarts are showing up for depending on the topic. And again, with some topics, you know, I haven't found the smarts, but I'm not disputing that. | '''Sam:''' Yeah, occasionally. But it's, it's, there is a kind, I mean, again, I'm a, not to psychoanalyze him, but there's this, there's a sort of Trumpian level personality problem layered on top of his intellect where, I'm not disputing the guy is smart, he's a, there's no question, he's smart, but there's just, there's so much personality to get through and wrangle with, to interact with whatever, whatever smarts are showing up for depending on the topic. And again, with some topics, you know, I haven't found the smarts, but I'm not disputing that. | ||
'''Sam:''' 01:21:47 The guy, obviously he's intelligent, is just, he's so, there's no one more enamored of his intelligence than him. Right. And it's just, it's like that level of egocentricity. Again, it has a kind of Trumpian, you know, peacock fan, a quality to it. And in in the cases where it's warranted, it's still extra and it's bullshit and it's annoying when it's unwarranted, it's embarrassing and he has zero sense of where he is on, on that landscape. | '''Sam:''' 01:21:47 The guy, obviously he's intelligent, is just, he's so, there's no one more enamored of his intelligence than him. Right. And it's just, it's like that level of egocentricity. Again, it has a kind of Trumpian, you know, peacock fan, a quality to it. And in in the cases where it's warranted, it's still extra and it's bullshit and it's annoying when it's unwarranted, it's embarrassing and he has zero sense of where he is on, on that landscape. | ||
'''Eric''' I hear what you're saying. I do have the sense of the number of floorboards that I can hide under when the storm troopers come from me, a very few and far between that I can count on and I can count on his. | '''Eric:''' I hear what you're saying. I do have the sense of the number of floorboards that I can hide under when the storm troopers come from me, a very few and far between that I can count on and I can count on his. | ||
'''Sam''' Okay. | '''Sam:''' Okay. | ||
'''Eric''' So, we don't need to derange on that front. | '''Eric:''' So, we don't need to derange on that front. | ||
'''Sam''' You're putting a high price on personality, I mean I get.. | '''Sam:''' You're putting a high price on personality, I mean I get.. | ||
'''Eric:''' 01:22:34 No, I'm about... | '''Eric:''' 01:22:34 No, I'm about... | ||
'''Sam''' ... a high price on personal loyalty. | '''Sam:''' ... a high price on personal loyalty. | ||
Eric But you know, Sam, I honestly, I find the same thing about you. If I'm in a storm, you're one of the tiny number of phone calls I can place and it's very odd for me that ... | '''Eric:''' But you know, Sam, I honestly, I find the same thing about you. If I'm in a storm, you're one of the tiny number of phone calls I can place and it's very odd for me that ... | ||
'''Sam''' Well, I would want you to, I would want you to feel that way. | '''Sam:''' Well, I would want you to, I would want you to feel that way. | ||
'''Eric''' I do. I absolutely do. | '''Eric:''' I do. I absolutely do. | ||
'''Sam''' So, when I call it pick it up and ... | '''Sam:''' So, when I call it pick it up and ... | ||
'''Eric''' Okay. | '''Eric:''' Okay. | ||
'''Sam''' But you need not, you need not shudder at what's coming. | '''Sam:''' But you need not, you need not shudder at what's coming. | ||
'''Eric''' But getting, getting back to the, to this large... So, with all of these very dangerous and disturbing topics, I start to understand that you believe, and I think it's correct that we often get to hell through a road paved with good intentions. | '''Eric:''' But getting, getting back to the, to this large... So, with all of these very dangerous and disturbing topics, I start to understand that you believe, and I think it's correct that we often get to hell through a road paved with good intentions. | ||
'''Sam''' Yeah. | '''Sam:''' Yeah. | ||
'''Eric''' I don't disagree with that. | '''Eric:''' I don't disagree with that. | ||
'''Sam''' And the, and the converse is also true. You can have, you can have good effects of, of bad intentions and that's, and you shouldn't, you shouldn't credit the good effects too highly there. You know, because like the, the, I think intentions matter for the most part. I mean, intentions are the operating system. So, we could like if you are, if you're iterating on your intentions, if you're, if your error correcting... | '''Sam:''' And the, and the converse is also true. You can have, you can have good effects of, of bad intentions and that's, and you shouldn't, you shouldn't credit the good effects too highly there. You know, because like the, the, I think intentions matter for the most part. I mean, intentions are the operating system. So, we could like if you are, if you're iterating on your intentions, if you're, if your error correcting... | ||
'''Eric''' Right. | '''Eric:''' Right. | ||
'''Sam''' And hewing back to, to the, the outcomes you actually want, right. That is, those are the people we can collaborate with that, you know, when they're, when they're ethical, they, the people who are right by accidents, are producing good things by accident are ... | '''Sam:''' And hewing back to, to the, the outcomes you actually want, right. That is, those are the people we can collaborate with that, you know, when they're, when they're ethical, they, the people who are right by accidents, are producing good things by accident are ... | ||
'''Eric''' It's, it's how, it's how we encode this. That's so interesting to me. Like when we order veal, we just say the word veal. We don't think about what it is that we're causing to occur. | '''Eric:''' It's, it's how, it's how we encode this. That's so interesting to me. Like when we order veal, we just say the word veal. We don't think about what it is that we're causing to occur. | ||
'''Sam''' I want the, I want the three-minute video before I eat the veal. | '''Sam:''' I want the, I want the three-minute video before I eat the veal. | ||
'''Eric''' Exactly. Like very few of us do that. When I think about like how Debbie Wasserman-Schultz... | '''Eric:''' Exactly. Like very few of us do that. When I think about like how Debbie Wasserman-Schultz... | ||
'''Sam''' But that's why I don't order veal, right. That that's a difference. At a certain point, too much information has a consequence. Right? Like I, I'm not comfortable with veal or foie gras, right. | '''Sam:''' But that's why I don't order veal, right. That that's a difference. At a certain point, too much information has a consequence. Right? Like I, I'm not comfortable with veal or foie gras, right. | ||
'''Eric''' Yeah. | '''Eric:''' Yeah. | ||
'''Sam''' So, it's like if, and it would matter, it should if you said, well, here's veal, but this is veal, this is pain-free veal. Right. | '''Sam:''' So, it's like if, and it would matter, it should if you said, well, here's veal, but this is veal, this is pain-free veal. Right. | ||
'''Eric''' Right. | '''Eric:''' Right. | ||
'''Sam''' This is veal that was, you know, synthesized in a lab. No animals involved. The problem goes away. So that's that. That's the fact that there is, you'd want there to be a difference there. | '''Sam:''' This is veal that was, you know, synthesized in a lab. No animals involved. The problem goes away. So that's that. That's the fact that there is, you'd want there to be a difference there. | ||
'''Sam:''' 01:24:44 You wouldn't want, I mean, well, take the most extreme case. You wouldn't want to be the person who would pay more for the veal if you knew there was more suffering associated with it. | '''Sam:''' 01:24:44 You wouldn't want, I mean, well, take the most extreme case. You wouldn't want to be the person who would pay more for the veal if you knew there was more suffering associated with it. Right, you wouldn't want to, we wouldn't want one, we wouldn't want to be the person who, for whom the suffering is part of the pleasure. Right? That's the, there, that's clearly a place on the moral landscape you don't want to be. | ||
'''Eric | '''Eric''' Yeah. And you don't want to be associated with, right. So, if that's at all unsavory, then they're there many gradations of better than that. | ||
Eric Right. So, it's back to my issue about orcas are either the best or worst species? | |||
Sam Yeah. No but I didn't mean to derail you there, but it matters. Like we need to unpack the mimetic complex and get at what's inside. And it matters if we, if we fail to, if there's a lot inside and we were, we're unaware of it. | |||
Eric Sure. | |||
Sam That matters. | |||
Eric Okay. | |||
Sam How often are we just saying veal, but | |||
Eric | |||
For example, I remember when Debbie Wasserman Schultz was being interviewed about superdelegates and she said they're not super delegates. They're unpledged delegates and delegates. And why do we have to have them? And I think she said something to the effect, and if I'm getting this wrong, I | |||
''' | '''Eric:''' 01:26:04 apologize. Something like, well, you wouldn't want the, the people who aren't regular party workers, you know, just being able to take over the party, something like this. I was thinking like, Oh, that's what we all think it is, that it's a primary and that the people who are registered Democrats should figure out who that they should support as a candidate. And her point was, well, we have to have a thumb on the scale, otherwise democracy might happen. | ||
Same Right? Yeah. | |||
Eric And like that thing is how we encode the badness. We encode it by creating some different way of talking about it. | |||
Sam How we encode it or we fail to encode it, how it becomes operable or how... | |||
Eric Well, nobody's a bad person in their own mind most of the time. | |||
Sam Yeah. Most. | |||
Eric So, when I do bad things, I encode it differently. So, we were just in a, in a situation where we were waiting in a very long line of cars for an off ramp and our car, you know, and our car sort of zoomed ahead and then asked somebody's you know understanding that we would cut in right towards the exit. | |||
''' | '''Eric:''' 01:27:11 So, you know, sort of high fiving like, geez, we almost got caught in that really long line. Later in the day somebody cuts in front of us, much less of a problem. It's like, can you believe that guy? And so, this way in which we sort of see ourselves as the permanent like good guy protagonist in the first case being savvy. | ||
Sam Yeah. But so, don't you think living a good life is in large measure a matter of kind of squeezing the, the delta between those two states of mind? | |||
'''Sam:''' 01: | Eric I think you think that that's true. | ||
Sam That's why it was a leading question. | |||
Eric I know, I know, but I think that it's actually much more tricky. | |||
Sam So, let's take the antithesis. What if I told you that I thought it was a matter of getting broadening that gulf, right? So, to be more extremely at odds with oneself, depending on what side of the table you're on. | |||
'''Eric:''' 01:28:03 See I think you would have been less likely to cut in line, but if you did cut in line, I wonder if you'd be less likely to notice it and talk about it the way I do. So, I think that your morality and my morality differ slightly. | |||
Sam I don't think you're giving me, you're giving Nassim Taleb too much credit and you're not giving me enough. | |||
Eric Oh, is that right? | |||
Sam So, so I am | |||
Eric I see you as being pretty consistent in a lot of ways. | |||
Sam Yeah. What I aspire to be is to, to cut in line the right amount. | |||
Eric Okay. | |||
Sam And to be appropriately nonjudgmental when I see someone else cut in line. | |||
Eric Well, so that's very odd. I'm pretty close to that. | |||
Sam Yeah. I mean I, so I don't have too many illusions about what it is to do it and what and but what it is when somebody else does it. So, I don't, I'm not as, and when I catch, when I occasionally catch myself in that, that mismatch between you know, who I'm capable of being in one moment and how judgmental I am of somebody else in that same mode. | |||
'''Eric:''' 01:29:02 Noticing your own sort of issues makes you a better person if you can port them more generally. So, in other words, if you say, look, I, I recognize that you know, I'm not the, I'm not the best around food or something, but yeah, I am very conscious in some other area like being timely. Well, if you can recognize some, somebody else's failings as akin to your own in a different area and port that, that's a way in which like being in touch with your own hypocrisy I think makes you a better person. And I worry about people who are trying to rid themselves of their hypocrisy rather than first noticing it and then sort of minimizing it so that it is, it's less garish. | |||
Sam But yeah. But to be, to truly want to minimize it, you have to be in touch with it. | |||
'''Eric:''' 01:29:59 Right. | |||
'''Sam''' So, we run those, that's two pieces of software you're running at the same time. | |||
'''Eric''' Well, it's, I think it's more like I don't see any prospect for ridding myself of it. And other people, so, I caught someone that I have to get rid of it. You know, it's like it's, it's a, it's an imagined state that they could, they could prove more or less that you can't live without it. | |||
'''Sam''' We, we, because you're not a unitary thing, right? | |||
'''Eric''' You aren't a unitary thing. Right. And most of us, even though we know that we still treat ourselves as unitary things, which is bizarre. | |||
Sam Yeah. | |||
Eric well you're in the mindfulness... | |||
Sam I work hard not to do that, | |||
Eric yeah, but I don't have an app, but I don't do, do these practices. But I'm still very conscious of that fact that I'm not, I'm not unitary. Yeah. | |||
Sam No, I mean that if you follow that a little bit further, that becomes very interesting because you're not, but that doesn't mean you, there's not a, there's no norm you wanted to aspire to follow. | |||
'''Sam:''' 01:30:53 Right. Like you can be, there are faces of your mind, you can prefer to others and you can, and there's also something that happens when you're, when you cease to be taken in by your, your different selves and all these different modes, right. To the, to the normal degree. Then you can actually, then there's a kind of freedom to navigate to a kind of a happier, conversation. | |||
Eric But there is some way in which what you're talking about is that one of your parliaments of selves is that your meta-self, which you're probably getting as close to identifying with unitarity as anything else. | |||
Sam Well, it's just, there is, the more you.. | |||
Eric The thing that supervises the sub-routines, you would probably call Sam Harris. | |||
Sam Well, I would, it's, it's more diaphanous and that may ultimately, it's, there's consciousness. I mean, the only thing that can supervise anything is, or be aware of anything or experience anything is what I'm calling consciousness. | |||
'''Sam:''' 01:31:52 Now, that's not when you really pay attention to what that's like. It doesn't actually answer to the, to the name I or me. I mean, it really is just, it's just this open space in which everything's appearing, including thoughts and intentions and desires and emotions. And there, it really is a, a cacophony, but the cacophony changes the more you fall back to this position of just witnessing the show. Right. And so, you know, it's like you're, you're I guess, let me give one analogy that's actually fairly apropos is the difference between dreaming and lucid dreaming. Right? The more you lucid a dream, the more you actually can kinda change your dreams. I mean, that's what it is. | |||
Eric It builds the point. | |||
Sam Yeah. But you're still, you know, there's a consequence to being lucid and in your, and being perpetually lost in thought being perpetually, being identified... | |||
Eric Of not noticing, | |||
Sam Not noticing, thought as thought, being identified with every intention that that surfaces in the mind is really deeply analogous to be, to being asleep and dreaming and not knowing you're dreaming. | |||
'''Sam:''' 01:33:03 Right. Whether you're in a situation you're not recognizing. | |||
Eric Well, it's interesting because sometimes I can't actually use the information. So, for example, when you went into the, don't we want the best and brightest thing, right? I thought, oh my God, Sam is going to drag me there. And that way he's to believe, well, no, because, because there is no thing called xenophillic restrictionism, which is what most of us are. Certainly, I am in, in my belief structure. And the idea that every single news organ is ready to call any restriction, a xenophobe. I'm thinking, oh my God, Sam is dragging me to this place. He doesn't even know it. And I'm starting to get angry and agitated and excited. And there was nothing I could do to actually, I couldn't find any control knob. | |||
Sam But so, it did come back to, to earth where you know, something more concrete than pure consciousness. | |||
'''Sam:''' 01:33:59 The, I'm aware of the potential hypocrisy in judging people. I saw, I take, you know, I just kind of shit all over Nassim Taleb. Right. I don't believe in freewill. I know he didn't invent himself. Like there's a place in which I'm totally nonjudgmental of him and these, you know, he can't do otherwise. Right. He's just, he's just being the perfect version of Nassim Taleb as is Donald Trump. Right? Like, that's just it. And in Trump's case, the thing that I'm judgmental, I'm not especially judgmental of him, you know, I mean, he, he seems like a malfunctioning robot to me. Right. He's, he's, he's just that what I'm judgmental of is the larger situation of all of this happening and peop- and half the population seemed to be pretending that it's something optimal about, right. | |||
'''Sam:''' 01:34:51 That's like, that's so terrifyingly risky to me that I think it's appropriate to be in touch with the, the outrage module rather than the nonjudgmental, all we're all in and nobody invented, nobody created themselves module. And but I, I pick and choose my moments of outrage and I get off the ride as soon as it's no longer, as soon as I notice there's no reason to be on it. | |||
Eric It's no longer adaptive. | |||
Sam So, it's like how much time am I getting? So now, like in my use of social media, like I'll get on Twitter, I'll see something outrageous, I'll get triggered by it, but I mean, I'll get off 30 seconds later and it's over. Right? Whereas if I, if I were to do the thing that entangled me, you know, it could, you know, it could take up much more of my life. | |||
'''Eric:''' 01:35:43 So it's very interesting to me that you've gotten off Twitter as you've become more focused on the meditation and mindfulness part of your offering. | |||
Sam Right. I mean, I, there's the juxtaposition there may be somewhat accidental, but the, the, the vividness, like it, there was a spell that's been broken for me with respect to social media. Like I, I, I had, and I actually, I had paid lip service to this and just didn't know that it was just lip service, but I had been talking about Twitter and social media generally as a psychological experiment that we were running ours on ourselves to which no one had consented. Right? We just enrolled half of humanity in this thing and we're just, you know, let's see what happens. And it's, it's clearly a having effects that are at best non-optimal right? You know, at worst, you know, catastrophic. | |||
'''Sam:''' 01:36:46 And I would, I was talking about this and thinking in these terms, but still totally embedded in, in the activity of, of taking Twitter seriously and, and feeling that it was a professional necessity. And on some level, it was just, it was just sticky enough, you know, emotionally like this is, you know, cause I am getting a lot of my news that way. I'm, I'm following smart people. I want to see what articles they're reading and there's an opportunity for conversation and then somebody like Nassim Taleb says something, you know, outrageously stupid that is, you know, directed at me. Right. And it goes, it's going out to hundreds of thousands of people. And so, you know, it's an opportunity for me to tell him to fuck off. And so, I find some way to say that and this thing begins playing out. And to the degree that I've stepped away, which is like 95% now when I come back and I see, you know, some of my friends I see you, you know, embroiled with, you know, you know Clare Lehman or somebody and it does look like I'm now in touch with the ... | |||
Eric You saw that get diffused? | |||
'''Sam:''' 01:37:48 Yeah, no, that, that and I think the skillful diffusal of those conflicts is its own public good that that thing they've tried to maximize and I think you're very good at that. | |||
'''Eric:''' 01:37:55 There are people I try to diffuse because I don't think they want the thing diffuse. Like you got into some, you went on this person, nice mangoes, podcasts | |||
Sam Yeah, that talk about no good deed go unpunished. I did my best to launch that podcast. | |||
Eric There's something wrong with that account because there's many ways in which it seems quite reasonable. | |||
Sam Yeah. And then it degraded into mental illness. | |||
Eric There's a personal, there's a personal nastiness about it that just doesn't let up. Sam | |||
Yeah. | |||
Eric And a lack of charity. And what I find is that there are certain things I can do to slow down that kind of a negative experience. And then there are certain die-hard actors, some of whom are quite polite and charming and funny who just will not, like their thing is they will ride this to the most negative place if they get there. And that sub-community I've been talking about in terms of we have diversity and inclusion, which I'm willing to say is a good thing. | |||
'''Eric:''' 01:39:02 And then it needs a different function, which is interoperability and exclusion because there are certain people who can't be at the table for a conversation if it's going to progress. And, because their, their interest is in derailing. And now I got into some weird thing just now. Do you know the singer Billy Bragg? | |||
Sam Ah no, | |||
Eric He's like a progressive, he's kind of like a punk Arlo Guthrie. Woody Guthrie rather. Yeah. And like he turns out he wrote a book and he's talking about Eric Weinstein an investment banker who is a free speech, you know, champion, won't meet with, I don't know, some whole, he's got a whole story in his mind. | |||
Sam And he so he took a shot at you and in his book? | |||
Eric He went on Sam Cedar's program. | |||
Sam Oh, well there's a venue that is not going to select for honest opinions. | |||
Eric I spoke to Sam. Look, there's a problem with the Saul Alinsky thing where Saul, you know, Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, the focus on ridicule. | |||
'''Eric:''' 01:40:01 I think it's hard to remember like Country Joe and the Fish was ridiculing a bad war in terms that are ridiculous. You've now got a group of people who if a mathematician says, you know that in in different arithmetics you could have an equation like two plus three equals one. And so, then you get somebody saying, "I don't know what they're smoking over there at Princeton, but..." yeah, well that's ridicule but you're ridiculing something that you straw man and didn't understand because the person actually was making sense. And so, what I see is that the left and in particular the Sam Cedar crowd has a | |||
Sam Doing that with abandon. | |||
Eric Well, it's willing to do two separate things. Sam is quite willing like there's this whole thing, like, will you talk to Sam Cedar, will you debate Sam Cedar? | |||
'''Eric:''' 01:40:54 My feeling is I would debate part of Sam Cedar, the part that just is focused on the ideas, but the part that is kind of like nasty and ridiculing and doing the Alinsky thing. I don't know what to do with it. I'm not interested. I've spoken to Sam Cedar on the phone is perfectly reasonable. Made sense to me. We disagreed on positions, but... | |||
Sam Well, the line that gets crossed for me always with these guys, and again it's, it's disproportionately on the left, is the line of conscious dishonesty, I mean, your brother's aphorism, bad faith changes everything. | |||
Bad faith changes everything. | |||
Sam And these guys are in bad faith. They know they're lying about, in my case, my views, my actual beliefs and | |||
Eric Not all of them. | |||
Sam Don't they? There's just too much information. | |||
Eric Well, David Pakman... | |||
Sam No, David Pacman's fine. I just did his podcast. Yeah, I know. | |||
'''Eric:''' 01:41:49 But David Pechman said some pretty non charitable things and some parts that seemed kind of ridiculing | |||
Sam Of me? | |||
Eric You, me, other people, | |||
Sam I haven't, whatever. I haven't, I have never seen him | |||
Eric He's pretty good | |||
Sam I've never seen him misrepresent my views and I think, I mean I, again, I don't know him, I just did his podcast once, but he seems like he seems like somebody who, if I said, listen, you've got me wrong here, that would matter. And he would, he would make an effort to get me right. | |||
Eric And that's the thing, which is the problem that we have increasingly is that the tactics that are being used in what are called progressive circles have been confused with the content. So that is, the objections to the vehicle, which might be Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, is conflated with... | |||
Sam It is a totally unethical program for smearing people, dishonestly. | |||
'''Eric:''' 01:42:48 Well, no, it's no, it's, an immoral technology... | |||
Sam It's an ends justify the means. | |||
Eric That's the big problem on the left. | |||
Sam Yeah. So, but that ethic is, is flawed, right? So, like, so for instance, I mean like with me and Trump, like there's nobody who you don't want to be the guy denigrates Trump as avidly as I do, but I am super careful to be honest. Right? So, like I, it's not that you can't even, you can smear him with his fare because you can be saying, I mean, the problem was solved. These guys can be Sam Cedar can be honest on a show and still have a show. Right? Nobody's going to cancel him because he was too honest. No, I, I think that there's like this very weird other, I mean say I don't want to get into the same Cedar thing in particular. | |||
'''Sam:''' 01:43:29 First of all, cause he's gonna do an entire show. We know you're [inaudible] but we'll take these quotations. No, but he, he, he has Pechman's ability to reason. I mean, I got this, the banality of evil, right? Like there's not that many evil people or there's just a lot of people who are functioning in some normal mode was with, with normal incentives and they become assholes because they're not heroes. Right. But so like it takes some work not to be an asshole when you are incentivized to be one and, and we're all vulnerable to this, but there's some people who have just cashed in that nonsense on the left makes me crazy because in part it just feels like all of my ideals turned into some piece of crap. That's where of the left, not only the left man. I came from a farther left part than I didn't even, I don't even know where you started, but yeah. | '''Sam:''' 01:43:29 First of all, cause he's gonna do an entire show. We know you're [inaudible] but we'll take these quotations. No, but he, he, he has Pechman's ability to reason. I mean, I got this, the banality of evil, right? Like there's not that many evil people or there's just a lot of people who are functioning in some normal mode was with, with normal incentives and they become assholes because they're not heroes. Right. But so like it takes some work not to be an asshole when you are incentivized to be one and, and we're all vulnerable to this, but there's some people who have just cashed in that nonsense on the left makes me crazy because in part it just feels like all of my ideals turned into some piece of crap. That's where of the left, not only the left man. I came from a farther left part than I didn't even, I don't even know where you started, but yeah. | ||