170
edits
Difference between revisions of "Theory of Geometric Unity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Key Ideas
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
* From Yang-Mills-Maxwell-Anderson-Higgs theory of gauge fields, we take the adjoint exterior derivative coupled to a connection $$d^\star_A F_A$$ | * From Yang-Mills-Maxwell-Anderson-Higgs theory of gauge fields, we take the adjoint exterior derivative coupled to a connection $$d^\star_A F_A$$ | ||
=== Problem Nr. 1: Einstein's Theory of General Relativity is not a proper Gauge Theory === | === Problem Nr. 1: Einstein's Theory of General Relativity is not a proper Gauge Theory === | ||
| Line 57: | Line 56: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
=== Problem Nr. 3: === | === Problem Nr. 3: The Higgs field introduces a lot of arbitrariness === | ||
<blockquote>"The Dirac field, Einstein's field, and the connection fields are all geometrically well-motivated but we push a lot of the artificiality that we do not understand into the potential for the scalar field that gives everything its mass. We tend to treat it as something of a mysterious fudge factor. So the question is, ''if we have a Higgs field: "why is it here and why is it geometric?''""</blockquote> | |||
=== Proposed Solution === | |||
== Layman Explanation == | == Layman Explanation == | ||