170
edits
Difference between revisions of "Peer Review"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Quotes == | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
The pressure for conformity is enormous. I have experienced it in editors’ rejection of submitted papers, based on venomous criticism of anonymous referees. The replacement of impartial reviewing by censorship will be the death of science. — Julian Schwinger | The pressure for conformity is enormous. I have experienced it in editors’ rejection of submitted papers, based on venomous criticism of anonymous referees. The replacement of impartial reviewing by censorship will be the death of science. — Julian Schwinger | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
<blockquote> | |||
Also, funding by peer review results in group-think and whole scientific fields floating off in a self-perpetuating irreality bubble for decades. Randomness will fund mavericks, mostly crackpots, but some may blow up established dysfunctional disciplines. — [https://twitter.com/i/status/1128389263526060032 David Chapman] | |||
</blockquote> | |||
== Resources & References == | == Resources & References == | ||
* [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1230888559411789824 Relevant tweet] by Eric that exemplifies how peer review fails. | * [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1230888559411789824 Relevant tweet] by Eric that exemplifies how peer review fails. | ||