Difference between revisions of "23: Agnes Callard - Courage, Meta-cognitive detachment and their limits"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
(Added watch button)
Line 14: Line 14:
* For 20% off your first order, visit http://mackweldon.com AND ENTER PROMO CODE: portal
* For 20% off your first order, visit http://mackweldon.com AND ENTER PROMO CODE: portal
* Receive 15% off your Four Sigmatic purchase go to http://foursigmatic.com/PORTAL
* Receive 15% off your Four Sigmatic purchase go to http://foursigmatic.com/PORTAL
== Transcript ==
[Intro Music]
E - Hello, you've found The Portal. I'm your host Eric Weinstien and today I am here with University of Chicago Professor of Philosophy, Agnes Callard.
A - Hi.
E - Agnes welcome!
A - Thank you.
E - I want to talk to you about everything,
A - Okay.
E - Do you mind?
A - No.
E -  So, you just had an interesting and bizarre gambit, I didn't know you were coming out to southern California and you said to me that after a meeting we had in your office at the University of Chicago, "Hey, you should take a look at this article I wrote partially based on our meeting." And the article is one about negotiating initial meetings and what are all the layers of dynamics that are going on when two people collide for the first time.
A - Yeah, I think that when two people collide for the first time I guess there are sort of two things at the base level that are happening. One of them is they are trying to figure out how to get along, how to cooperate, and the other is they are trying to take the measure of one another. And those activities aren't totally separate from one another.
E - And, I've noticed a pattern with you which is that you take great delight in talking about the things that many of us do sort of naturally or unconsciously. It might be very uncomfortable to promote to full consciousness so that you can use your metacognitive facility to interrogate and dissect what is going on many many different levels; Some of them philosophical, some of them rooted in biology, some of them maybe with allusions to literature. When you and I met, were you aware of what you were going through in real time or did it come to you later that this was going to be grist for an article.
A - Oh, totally later. My mind was completely on another article I was working on.
E - Oh, so you weren't concentrating on when we were meeting, on our meeting?
A - No, not really. Oh, I mean, I think that a lot of the time I feel like a lot of the thinking that I do is like unpacking thinking I did earlier but wasn't realizing I was doing. Or something like that. So, like...
[02:29] E - It's hard with this language when you have to say "I" when you're actually realizing you have so many different processes. Okay, keep going.
A - Right, I guess maybe one common thread.. I do like to, yeah maybe I kind of have an affinity towards the provocative or something but maybe at a deeper level I think that there is just, when we talk about ourselves / when we think about our lives there are all these sort of cracks in the facade of, like, who we take ourselves to be and how we present ourselves. But the thing is, like, that we have kind of convinced ourselves that the cracks are part of the design because we have been looking at them so long, right? Like, Ooh look what a pretty pattern. And I want


== Transcript of the last 20 minutes ==
== Transcript of the last 20 minutes ==
Anonymous user

Navigation menu