Difference between revisions of "27: Daniel Schmachtenberger - On Avoiding Apocalypses"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:
Daniel is seen as a leader of the growing [[Game B]] subculture of the human potential movement. This group bets that there is a second evolutionary stable strategy for cohabiting not based on conflict or rivalry, even for life raised in Game A (i.e. standard evolutionary and economic environments based on scarcity and rivalrous goods). Eric asks Daniel about where the bright spots and progress might be in this movement which refuses to accept the fate that that Eric has elsewhere put forward as the [[Twin Nuclei Problem]] of having unlocked the power of both Cell and Atom in the early 1950s without the wisdom to use it.  
Daniel is seen as a leader of the growing [[Game B]] subculture of the human potential movement. This group bets that there is a second evolutionary stable strategy for cohabiting not based on conflict or rivalry, even for life raised in Game A (i.e. standard evolutionary and economic environments based on scarcity and rivalrous goods). Eric asks Daniel about where the bright spots and progress might be in this movement which refuses to accept the fate that that Eric has elsewhere put forward as the [[Twin Nuclei Problem]] of having unlocked the power of both Cell and Atom in the early 1950s without the wisdom to use it.  


{{#widget:Art19Episode|show=the-portal|id=08563af6-9390-4fbc-a4ee-5326bf958c6e|width=56%}}
{{#widget:OmnyFMEpisode|show=the-portal|slug=27-daniel-schmachtenberger-on-avoiding-apocalypses|width=65%}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=_b4qKv1Ctv8}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=_b4qKv1Ctv8}}


Navigation menu