Difference between revisions of "Interoperability and Exclusion"

<blockquote>

<blockquote>

There are certain die-hard actors, some of whom are quite polite and charming and funny, who just will not—like, their thing is they will ride this to the most negative place if they can get there. And that sub-community I've been talking about in terms of, we have "diversity and inclusion", which I'm willing to say is a good thing, and then it needs a different function, which is "interoperability and exclusion", because '''there are certain people who can't be at the table for a conversation if it's going to progress'''.

There are certain die-hard actors, some of whom are quite polite and charming and funny, who just will not—like, their thing is they will ride this to the most negative place if they can get there. And that sub-community I've been talking about in terms of, we have "diversity and inclusion", which I'm willing to say is a good thing, and then it needs a different function, which is "interoperability and exclusion", because '''there are certain people who can't be at the table for a conversation if it's going to progress'''.

</blockquote>

</blockquote>

{{#widget:Tweet|id=1432790183104040963}}

{{#widget:Tweet|id=1432790183104040963}}

[[Category:Ericisms]]

[[Category:Ericisms]]