8
edits
Difference between revisions of "Emotive Conjugation Explorer Meeting Notes"
Emotive Conjugation Explorer Meeting Notes (view source)
Revision as of 06:21, 11 May 2020
, 06:21, 11 May 2020no edit summary
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=='''[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jkUQ3-_pNsJWFMl55_yytGubAg67V3ufzosg6i088l8/edit# 09/05/2020 meeting, working document]'''== | |||
=== Actions === | |||
* Vecordia & Concepthut to read and mark up 10 articles in total (5 CNN, 5 Fox News, 1 CNN vs 1 Fox News for same news topic), catch-up around Wednesday | |||
* We need the person who was to help with UI designs to get in touch | |||
* Consider reading Voltaire, Candide is good :) | |||
* Extremerouge to share his competitive research with ConceptHut who’ll put it on google drive and share a link with the rest (requested via DM by Vecordia) | |||
=== Discussion === | |||
* Betaridley & ConceptHut discussed approach to development, freestyle vs directed, as some creativity is required | |||
* We probably had some mishaps with timings as reliable people who said they’d show up didn’t | |||
* Run-over the revised structure of our wiki pages by ConceptHut (Illuminator being our arching project, Explorer this group’s project, Detector Konstantine’s one) | |||
* A word about info continuity and meeting notes - Vecordia can do that to a degree going forward, provided that she’s in a meeting and that there is something to write down (as it should or we got the meeting wrong :D) | |||
* We watched together the video: https://youtu.be/YRkkkxZZpAcWe concluded that: | |||
** Non-objective colourful news sort of includes a CTA, appeals to emotions thus provoking responses, | |||
** People want to know the takeaway of information, | |||
** Commentary on: types of polarizing, | |||
** Easier to be interested in news when it is bad | |||
* The issue that people don't read the article but just the headline - seems like we should care about this at least from comms/ marketing point of view and think how to address it best (because our tool illuminates content, it is focused on the content; if people don't read the article as such, then they will not benefit from our tool most, so we want them to read the article and/ or we want our tool to analyse the headline as well) | |||
* There is also an issue with sloppy writing, punctuation/ grammar/ structure/ orthography mistakes in online news - probably not our concern for the MVP but those basic mistakes make readers distrust the content | |||
=='''[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jkUQ3-_pNsJWFMl55_yytGubAg67V3ufzosg6i088l8/edit# 03/05/2020 meeting, working document]'''== | =='''[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jkUQ3-_pNsJWFMl55_yytGubAg67V3ufzosg6i088l8/edit# 03/05/2020 meeting, working document]'''== | ||