5,849
edits
Difference between revisions of "A Portal Special Presentation- Geometric Unity: A First Look"
A Portal Special Presentation- Geometric Unity: A First Look (view source)
Revision as of 15:28, 27 April 2020
, 15:28, 27 April 2020→Geometric Unity: A First Look
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
<p>[00:15:41] I respect Tyler a great deal and I enjoy his company, but I have to say that I am absolutely of a different opinion. My belief is that one has no rights and no ability as a scientist to fudge the data to meet social goals in this fashion. Another interesting interaction was the interaction with Professor [[Agnes Callard]] of the University of Chicago. | <p>[00:15:41] I respect Tyler a great deal and I enjoy his company, but I have to say that I am absolutely of a different opinion. My belief is that one has no rights and no ability as a scientist to fudge the data to meet social goals in this fashion. Another interesting interaction was the interaction with Professor [[Agnes Callard]] of the University of Chicago. | ||
<p>[00:16:05] Now, when she listened to [[episode 19]] about [[Bret Weinstein]], she found that it was a very compelling episode, but strangely, even though the point of the episode was to surface Bret's long forgotten theory, because Bret had not been acknowledged as having predicted that laboratory mice would in particular have radically elongated [[ | <p>[00:16:05] Now, when she listened to [[19: Bret Weinstein - The Prediction and the DISC|episode 19]] about [[Bret Weinstein]], she found that it was a very compelling episode, but strangely, even though the point of the episode was to surface Bret's long forgotten theory, because Bret had not been acknowledged as having predicted that laboratory mice would in particular have radically elongated [[Telomere|telomeres]] where it was thought that all mice had long, radically elongated telomeres which has incredible potential implications for drug testing and all of the work that is done on laboratory, rodents as model organisms. | ||
<p>[00:16:43] This is an episode you should definitely listen to if you haven't already. But Agnes's perspective was very different than mine. Her feeling was that because we were in a situation in which the work actually surfaced, that the system worked, even if it was the case that Bret's name was erased from the history of the development. | <p>[00:16:43] This is an episode you should definitely listen to if you haven't already. But Agnes's perspective was very different than mine. Her feeling was that because we were in a situation in which the work actually surfaced, that the system worked, even if it was the case that Bret's name was erased from the history of the development. | ||