1,165
edits
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
That which is being fooled is the more neurologically advanced of the two species. And so what I've talked about, somewhat controversially, is what I call Artificial Out-telligence. Where instead of actually having an artificially intelligent species you can imagine a dumb computer program that uses the reward, through let's say genetic algorithms and selection within a computer framework, to increasingly parasitize using better and better lures, fully intelligent humans. | That which is being fooled is the more neurologically advanced of the two species. And so what I've talked about, somewhat controversially, is what I call Artificial Out-telligence. Where instead of actually having an artificially intelligent species you can imagine a dumb computer program that uses the reward, through let's say genetic algorithms and selection within a computer framework, to increasingly parasitize using better and better lures, fully intelligent humans. | ||
And in the case of Artificial Intelligence I don't think we're there yet. But in the case of Artificial | And in the case of Artificial Intelligence I don't think we're there yet. But in the case of [[Artificial Outelligence]], I can't find anything that's missing from the equation. So we have self-modifying code. You have Bitcoin so you could have a reward structure and Blockchains. And there's nothing that I see that keeps us from creating. | ||
Now that’s such a such a strange and quixotic possibility. Now in this framework I don't see an existential risk so that my friends who worry about machine intelligence being a terminal invention for the human species probably don't need to be worried. | Now that’s such a such a strange and quixotic possibility. Now in this framework I don't see an existential risk so that my friends who worry about machine intelligence being a terminal invention for the human species probably don't need to be worried. | ||