Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ericisms"
(Created page with "I propose the following changes be made to this page: # We rename it from “Eric-isms” to “Eric Weinstein Glossary of Terms”. Reason: improve SEO, clarity for users. #...") |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I commented out your latest edit (WikiProject) Aardvark, because it was pointing to this page which I believe needs more work before it's helpful for users. -[[User:JayG|JayG]] October 20, 2020 | |||
I propose the following changes be made to this page: | I propose the following changes be made to this page: | ||
# We rename it from “Eric-isms” to “Eric Weinstein Glossary of Terms”. Reason: improve SEO, clarity for users. | # We rename it from “Eric-isms” to “Eric Weinstein Glossary of Terms”. Reason: improve SEO, clarity for users. | ||
# We should include | # We should include more important concepts: EGOs, DISC, etc. However, these larger projects should only have a couple of sentences and should link to the dedicated page. Reason: improve SEO and UX, as well as consistency. -[[User:JayG|JayG]] | ||
: I guess I undid your change. Maybe we should discuss? I named it back to Ericisms, just because that's what I was looking for and couldn't find. If I'm in the minority, I'm happy to change it back --[[User:BeefSandwich27|BeefSandwich27]] ([[User talk:BeefSandwich27|talk]]) 19:45, 8 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
I'm good with it either way. My reasoning was that more people would be searching for "Eric Weinstein" than "Eric-isms" and it would draw more viewers. | |||
Initial reasoning for this change was because of how well the industry terms glossary pages did with SEO at my previous company -[[User:JayG|JayG]] August 10, 2020 | |||
== "Please use the Ericism template" == | |||
I want newbs to have zero added friction/cognitive-load when they first come to this page. If they want to edit and do it "wrong" that's ok. At least they added something. We can come up behind and format it correctly later on. Sound reasonable? --[[User:BeefSandwich27|BeefSandwich27]] ([[User talk:BeefSandwich27|talk]]) 14:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Occupation - Imposter == | |||
https://youtu.be/DvPvFDF9dAE?t=4570 | |||
"I've listed my occupation as Imposter on numerous occasions" | |||
Not too sure if it rises to the level of Ericism quite yet | |||
: Eric definitely talks about being an impostor. If I'm not mistaken, he even said that was a potential name for the podcast. I guarantee he's riffed on the imposter topic. We should search for it and add it. Good 👀 --[[User:BeefSandwich27|BeefSandwich27]] ([[User talk:BeefSandwich27|talk]]) 20:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:24, 21 November 2020
I commented out your latest edit (WikiProject) Aardvark, because it was pointing to this page which I believe needs more work before it's helpful for users. -JayG October 20, 2020
I propose the following changes be made to this page:
- We rename it from “Eric-isms” to “Eric Weinstein Glossary of Terms”. Reason: improve SEO, clarity for users.
- We should include more important concepts: EGOs, DISC, etc. However, these larger projects should only have a couple of sentences and should link to the dedicated page. Reason: improve SEO and UX, as well as consistency. -JayG
- I guess I undid your change. Maybe we should discuss? I named it back to Ericisms, just because that's what I was looking for and couldn't find. If I'm in the minority, I'm happy to change it back --BeefSandwich27 (talk) 19:45, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
I'm good with it either way. My reasoning was that more people would be searching for "Eric Weinstein" than "Eric-isms" and it would draw more viewers.
Initial reasoning for this change was because of how well the industry terms glossary pages did with SEO at my previous company -JayG August 10, 2020
"Please use the Ericism template"
I want newbs to have zero added friction/cognitive-load when they first come to this page. If they want to edit and do it "wrong" that's ok. At least they added something. We can come up behind and format it correctly later on. Sound reasonable? --BeefSandwich27 (talk) 14:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Occupation - Imposter
https://youtu.be/DvPvFDF9dAE?t=4570
"I've listed my occupation as Imposter on numerous occasions"
Not too sure if it rises to the level of Ericism quite yet
- Eric definitely talks about being an impostor. If I'm not mistaken, he even said that was a potential name for the podcast. I guarantee he's riffed on the imposter topic. We should search for it and add it. Good 👀 --BeefSandwich27 (talk) 20:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)