170
edits
Difference between revisions of "Theory of Geometric Unity"
→Proposed Solution
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
''This would be a program for some kind of unification of Dirac's type, but in the force sector. The question is, "does this really make any sense? Are there any possibilities to do any such thing?"'' | ''This would be a program for some kind of unification of Dirac's type, but in the force sector. The question is, "does this really make any sense? Are there any possibilities to do any such thing?"'' | ||
</blockquote> | |||
<blockquote> | |||
[[File:GU vision.png|right|500px|right]] | |||
Let's talk about what the Geometric Unity (GU) proposal is. First of all, we observe that we have a division into intrinsic theories and auxiliary theory and between physics and mathematics. And intrinsic physical theory would be general relativity. An auxiliary physical theory would be the Yang-Mills theory, with the freedom to choose internal quantum numbers. | |||
At the mathematical level, an intrinsic theory would be, the older semi-Riemannian geometry. The study of manifolds with length and angle. Auxiliary geometry is what we're going to call fiber bundle theory or modern gauge theory. | |||
''Geometric Unity is the search for some way to break down the walls between these four boxes.'' | |||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||